Commerce NL400 with 5/10 blinds. Both hands are shallow stacked, but i don't think that makes my decisions automatic. Or does it?


Hand one:
UTG: Me with $600
MP1: $370


Villian is a loose/passive lady who can turn a little aggressive after the flop.

I am dealt QQ

I raise to $40, MP1 re-raises to $100, I go all in for $370.



Hand 2:
This villian is a fairly tight player who plays somewhat weakly after the flop. But remember that this is the Commerce NL400, where "all in" carries a lot less weight than deep stacked (or even normal stacked) games.

MP2: $320
Cutoff: me with $600

I am dealt AK

MP2 raises to $40, folded around, I re-raise to $100, MP2 re-raises all in to $320

Hand 1 is completely standard, don't slowroll hand 2

what part of these hands is questionable?????

hand 1. totally std you basically have the nuts

hand 2. totally std you basically have the nuts

this is why live poker is so soft....man, if only live poker had a "mute" button, I'd be there 24/7

Teach me how to buy houses and be rich please Rika.

I think the AK is much easier. Once you put 33% effective with AK, you are finished. Caput. Hand is over. always call. I don't care if your opponent plays 5% vpip.

The QQ is kinda of scary versus old lady min raisers. But don't see how you can go wrong with all-in unless you have extraordinary read (and then they show you JJ and you feel like a ******).

We don't care about your results. Yes old lady had AA-KK, but who cares. Next hand.

40BB shortstacked play QQ AK fistpump allin. wtf threads here are getting more and more ******ed