Welcome to the forum, OP. I'm afraid you're asking the wrong question.
Could you have lost less? Absolutely.
Should you have tried to lose less? Nope.
When the money went in, your EV in the pot was +$53ish. You had (approx, since we don't know SB's hand) 42.4% equity in the main pot of $362 (average return = $153.49) and 56.4% equity in the side pot of $182 (assuming you meant CO had $185 total, and not $185 more) (average return $104.34). Thus your expected return was $257.83. You put $205 into the pot, so on average you'd profit by $52.83. Getting the money in with that kind of EV is what you want.
With only $91 left after SB's shove, CO wasn't likley folding the NFD OTF or OTT. He had 9 outs to the near nuts. By the rule of 2 and 4, he would have had about 18% equity (even assuming his overpair draws were no good) and even after the blank turn, and $91 would represent only 16.7% of the total pot, so he would have had a profitable draw even then, and even without his K outs. Sometimes a situation arises that, given the pot that already exists, is profitable for more than one player, and this is an example of it.
So as for the hand, this->
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balerion1
3b pre often, the rest looks fine.
As far as posting, it's far too late to edit it now, but in the future, please just post up to your decision point (so in this hand it would be after SB's shove) and stop there, posting "Hero?" Knowing the results often biases people's advice.