Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Cbetting at 1/2 Cbetting at 1/2

01-12-2012 , 11:21 PM
i like to c-bet when i am sure that i won't make the mistake of not barreling the turn when i should have or barreling the turn when i shouldn't have.
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-08-2012 , 12:04 PM
I would like to see more thoughts and further analysis on this topic, specially what situations do u barel the turn? So many live players will call the flop with bottom pair, and i think u can get so many folds ott
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-08-2012 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerIsFrustrating
What he's saying is if you're a LAG you simply cannot raise all the time pre and then shut it down post.

If you LAG it up you will get called much more frequently post. The way you win money is by making big turn and river bets.

Either villains will call the flop (or turn) and then fold the turn (or river) and you take big pots down without showdown

OR

Villains think you are always FOS so they call your big turn and river bets because they think you're bluffing.

If you cbet less as a LAG you're basically doing your opponents a favor and pot controlling, allowing them to call easier when you're bluffing and causing you to win less when you have big hands.

So basically if you're going to LAG you need to be betting a ton to set up your late street plays.

----

If you're a TAG this doesn't matter as much because you're usually playing solid values. You're not looking to hit crazy deceptive hands and stack, and you're not looking to run massive bluffs.

Finally you usually have more equity if you check than a LAG would since your hands are better on average.

Raising every hand pre and then playing only the nuts post is a recipe for disaster, even at 1/2.
i think this was what pokahblows was trying to say. basically youre not even considered a LAG if youre not cbetting a ton, youre just a preflop pot bloater thats not loose aggressive at all. obviously you get less respect w cbets as a LAG. anyways these threads have been made over and over again and you really cant make these threads because there are too many different villains and player tendencies and board textures and current image to determine how often you cbet/should cbet. if youre a lag and have tightened up what do you do? if youre a tag and have been super card dead what do you do? what if youre up against someone who peels flop light? what if youre against someone who only plays the nuts? too many different variables

/thread this has been discussed ad nauseam
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-08-2012 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewLiveFish
There is no concensus, because as mentioned above it should be villain dependent.

That said, there are some general concepts to keep in mind. First, the more you bet when you cbet, the more effective your cbet has to be to be +EV. For example if the pot is 30 and you bet 15, you only have to be effective in your cbets 34% of the time to be +EV. If you cbet 30, you have to be effective 50% of the time.

Since many in LLSNL play fit or fold and don't pay attention to the size of the bet, cbet effectiveness is fairly inelastic. Therefore, there's little purpose in making too big of a cbet when you want a fold.

Next, it is easier to get a fold from your cbet when you are in position vs. being oop. Someone calling oop has to face the idea on the turn that they will have to show continued weakness by checking. When IP, they can peal a card and see if you really meant it on the turn.

Dry flops are easier to get folds from than wet flops. If a flop is K72r, there just isn't much for someone to draw to. If it is T98 two tone, there's tons of hands that can feel they have IO to call almost any size bet.

The more people in the hand, the more people that can actually hit the flop. If you use that old rule of thumb that you'll hit a flop 33% of the time, one can see that cbetting one player can often be successful. When you add a second player, one of them will hit the flop over 55% of the time. If you are cbetting the pot, this becomes a negative EV situation. Raise it to 3 players and your chances of a cbet working drops to under 30%.

Finally, you'll want to balance some of your checks on the flop when you don't bet with good hands to prevent people from exploiting you. You can often pick up two bets from people who believe you don't have a decent hand because you checked the flop and they don't want to be bluffed.
I agree with most of this, but your percentages are a bit misleading regarding "hitting the flop." Yes, two unpaired cards will make A pair 1/3 of the time. That means assuming ATC, they will make top pair 11% of the time (much smaller! It also means that when you bet with A-high, it is often a value bet against drawing hands and not a bluff.) Again, ranging becomes important here, as most players are not going to play ATC, so if a player plays mostly PPs and broadways, a low flop will almost always give him a whiff, as the PPs make up a smaller portion of his range, and the odds of the low cards on the board actually matching the PP in his hand reduces that percent even further. If the board comes out KQJ, there's a big chance he hit two pair or even a straight, but if he checks to you, the 2-pair becomes a lot less likely, so the scariness of the board can often increase the FE of a Cbet.

The long and short of it IMHO is that being the PF raiser in position against 1-2 opponents provides a number of very valuable c-bet opportunities. Some opponents will call you all the way down with bottom pair, so obviously you should value bet them thin rather than cbet. If, given no other info, was simply asked "Cbet or no cbet?" My answer is "cbet." Your cbets will usually win you a pot bigger than the size of your bet, so they will not even have to be successful 50% of the time to work. If the table is disrespecting your cbets (check-raising, check-calling down with smal pairs), then you need to switch tactics and use your loose image to get paid with value hands. But I usually find that if I play pretty tight for a few orbits, many tables will allow me to cbet mercilessly for at least an hour before people start playing back at me...at least at 1/2 that's what I see.

Finally, I have no problem with saying cbet 70%. Harrington advocates randomizing play for deceptive purposes. I say cbet 70% both because it provides deception, but also because I usually feel like cbets will be effective roughly 70% of the time (i.e. - the right board conditions and villain conditions exist...but I defeinitely adjust this number for tables with unusual dynamics). I also can't tell you how many times I've checked behind after having cbet a lot, and a player can't control his frustration, shouting something like "C'mon where's the cbet" when he was waiting to check-raise. You disappoint someone once or twice in this spot and they will be afraid to trap you when there's any draw on the board - which is like 80% of the time...
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-08-2012 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by playertee
I would like to see more thoughts and further analysis on this topic, specially what situations do u barel the turn? So many live players will call the flop with bottom pair, and i think u can get so many folds ott
That's one of the toughest questions. Referring to HOH again, double-barrels need to occur much less frequently, due to the fact that you are often getting close to pot commitments after a pf raise and a cbet. Whereas on the flop, I need a reason not to bet, on the turn I need a reason to bet.

Reasons to barrel turn:

I think I have the best hand
I have a strong draw
My opponent acts like he is drawing
My opponent likes to peel flop and fold turn
My image is tight
I am heads up
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-08-2012 , 02:49 PM
I maintain a very high Cbet/double barrel freq and I play 1/2nl almost exclusively. Against typical villains i feel this is higher EV and high variance. But I sometimes think that I should just shut down when I miss flops and only CBet when I hit, since most villains don't seem to pay enough attention to notice such obvious play for what it is. I. Suppose it's highly dependent on the stickiness of villains and your threshold for variance.
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-08-2012 , 02:54 PM
I probably c-bet almost every pot I play heads up when I raised, especially in position or against tight players. I'm skipping c-bets for read reasons - flop is AK6, I have J10 and the calling station old man never calls a pre flop raise without an ace. Stuff like that.

3 ways I'm a little tamer but still doing it a lot

4 ways + I need to be in position on good boards before I start getting out of line. 1/2 players call often enough with trash that there's no reason to spew. Besides, if it checks to you on turn you may be able to steal it then with more knowledge about their hand strength.
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-09-2012 , 03:16 AM
Not sure why this thread got necro'd, but I'll throw in my new 2 cents.

If anyone listens to Bart Hanson's podcasts or videos he pretty much explained why it's good to 2 barrel a lot.

I double barrel a TON on boards like 923, T74, etc because the turn will often bring an overcard and most villains won't call another bet.

I do it even when I'm not the PF raiser.

I.e. guy raises UTG, I call with xx, BB calls. Flop comes Q73. Utg checks, I bet, utg calls. Turn is a 9, utg checks, I bet, UTG folds.

Bad players love to peel light and good players know to fold weakish hands.
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote
03-09-2012 , 03:18 AM
Bart rules, double barrel FTW,lmao.
Cbetting at 1/2 Quote

      
m