$1/$3 home game. Two full tables running, my table is by far the bigger table with the stacks ranging from $500-$2000. The table play is somewhat loose and every hand has a few hundred in the middle.
Villain: 40's guy. Deals another local game. Known for playing solid. I've only played with him one other time but I can tell from speaking with him and watching how he plays that he is a thinking player, can question himself ' what can I beat?' Etc. has $700 almost exactly behind.
Hero: 25 years old. A regular in the game. has been playing aggressive, betting at uncontested pots, not showing many hands, but is overall looked at as someone who 'has it' more often than not. Within a previous orbit got a full double from a guy who flopped top 2 on AKQ board while hero valued JT into a river shove that got called. Villain saw this. Hero has $1200 or so.
Other 2 irrelevant villains have over $1k a piece also.
9 handed, folds to irrelevant villain in cutoff who makes it $10
Hero calls $10 on button w/ 33.
Villain makes it $50 on sb.
Bb is irrelevant, calls $50.
Original raiser calls $50.
Hero calls $50. (is this a fold? With stacks so deep I didn't think it was)
Flop ($200): 7
7
4
Everyone, including hero checks.
Turn ($200): 4
Checks to hero.
Hero bets $150.
Villain in sb calls.
All others fold.
River ($500): Q
Villain checks.
Hero shoves for the remaining stack of villain, approx $500.
I felt like with my image and his ability to figure out hands, he could find a fold here with all A high hands at minimum. I felt any big pair would bet/shut down to a call on this flop, or at least bet turn.
Was this just a complete spew play? Or does this line look believable to a thinking player who has just seen me show the nuts and has a perception that I usually have it when I'm firing barrels into a pot?
Thanks in advance.