Quote:
Originally Posted by durkadurkaorca
Just curious what is the(a) rationale for not raising (say if one were to play devil's advocate).
In general the rationale for not raising with the nuts is to maximize how much you win by not scaring away the weaker hands that may put more money in the middle if they flop a pair or like the flop. You already have all of UTGs money but now are trying to figure out how to get the max from MP. Examples:
MP has AQs and decided to call for $60 more but will not call $200+, but if you flat and a Q comes on the flop they may stack off or at least call another couple of hundred.
MP has a JJ-TT type hand and may bet / call on a safe board (9 high) but again will fold to the $200+.
Given effective stack size of MP $900 this is worth discussion. The consensus of most here seem to be to raise, perhaps since we are essentially heads up against a LAG. But I think the best answer comes down to how likely you think LAG is to call the raise. Either way we can play a huge pot.
If we flat pre the pot is $217 and we will probably have to donk bet 3 times. If we lead flop for $150 and get called then there's $517 in the pot and V has $678 behind. We can bet $300-$350 OTT, then get the rest on the river. Obviously this is all at the risk of V catching up and doubling through.
If we raise we get more of our money in good and make it easier to get it all if he calls but we run the risk of MP folding and losing a ton of value.
For me it would probably depend on the Villain, I think either method COULD be correct.