Given stack sizes I'm just getting it in. Pot is about $75 heading to the flop and V only has $165 back, so SPR is 2.2. I'm pretty much never folding AA on those facts without a confirmed read that V is super nitty and maybe even with that read.
If V only does this with AK and sets, he has 6 combos of AK and 7 combos of sets so given the money already in the pot we can happily get it in. If he can have QJ, then he can also have all sorts of flush draws and worse Ks as well, so would still get it in.
PF: What is the position "D"? I think you meant "B" for button but then you repeat "D" again. Oh wait...you mean Dealer...OK. Better to use "BTN" to mean the button position.
The 3! is too low. We are basically min-raising and giving the rest of the field good odds to call and crack our Aces. If UTG calls, the next V (MP) will get 91:33 or 2.8:1. Plus we usually want to raise a bit more out of the blinds since we will be playing the hand OOP. I like a raise to $50 with the intent of get it in.
F (91): Our SPR is less than 2, we are heads-up on a board where V could easily be raising a draw or AK; never folding. If he has a set, so be it.
Shove. Not loving it given Hero's perceived range is crystal clear yet V is eff shoving over it, however, what makes this an easy call (other than stacks) is the antiblock holding of AA non-diamond which widens up V so much that you can call more correctly here eventhough you're trailing hand v range on this flop. AT (limp AJ/AQs?) KT-KQ, TT,99, QJs, 87s and some other bway type hands are part of a realistic general limp-c range (at $35) for non-described V. You could have done a little more PF, which works better with a Cbet-c line this shallow. Deeper, all of the above goes out the window and V archetype comes into play a bit more, but here, bet-shove is fine, realize your equity eventhough you're likely around 30% on a shove, it's always going to be better than bet-f