Grunch
preface gripe: why bother referring to the SB and BB as V2 and V3 if you’re just going to refer to them as SB/BB later on?
We’re getting almost 5:1. Knowing V1 is effectively a spew monkey, we have to be mentally prepared to call down lots of run outs, but this can be highly profitable, even if the variance is also high. We’re also going to have the best position relative to SB/BB because we’ll get to see if they raise/call/fold cbets from V1. With that being said KJo is not the greatest hand.
I think the hand works as a call, raise, or fold.
I think the strongest case can be made for raising. We block KK and JJ, which would all be raising here if we had them and obv makes it harder for Vs to have KK, JJ, and AK. We could potentially get hands that dominate us to fold, like AJ, KQ, maybe even AQ. Additionally, some PPs will fold some % of the time. We have a hand that doesn’t play great multi-way and that we’re perfectly happy to win the 23bb pot right now.
AP OTF: is 1/3psb considered “aggressive” for SB? I wouldn’t consider that aggressive, but I’m unsure if any betting/raising action by SB would be connected with strength. If it is, we might be able to just fold here if our read is that good. If not I think we need to call. I think raising is spewy and I want to see what V1 does. V1 raising doesn’t necessary mean fold, because it’s dependent on what SB does and the sizing.