Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrucci
I understand your point. But i just dont think many villains will keep bluffing on the river if they whiff considering the small stacksizes behind if we flat the turn. If we had deeper stacks behind and villain had more percieved fold equity on a river bluff i am on board with your line.
there would be more than half pot remaining on the river. it's enough to bluff at the pot. our hand was strong enough to go for 2 streets and we checked turn. given player type we might as well continue to show weakness and flat call here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperknit
even if v will have the correct price to call off with a combo draw, we would still prefer to get the money in before he sees the river in this case. any time u get more money in with an equity advantage thats a good thing.
and if he bluffs the river we get the money in with 100% equity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperknit
thats the part where im afraid to let him outplay me. suppose we make our plan to x/c the riv.
so because we are afraid to let the villain outplay us we should just allow them to play perfectly against us and fold out bluffs, call off combo draws and his entire value range?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperknit
well what if the riv is: K, Q, J, T, 9, any heart. now we risk facing a bet from a hand that beats us, and its possible he would always check back a hand worse than AK, or maybe he would sometimes bluff at those cards, or maybe he would overbluff at those cards. we cant really know
we are potentially already beat on the turn. when we x/r the turn we are removing the potential for villain to make a mistake here. given our read on villain that he bombs it vs perceived weakness and we have telegraphed weakness on the turn we should continue to telegraph weakness and call here. we are not meaningfully denying equity vs most flushdraws here that are going to bet the turn as a semi-bluff.
do we really care about allowing a hand drawing to 4 or 8 outs to see the river if villain is likely to shove for half pot with those hands if they miss? no.
we have to consider if our read on villain's tendencies are correct. we show weakness on the turn when we check. then when we go from check to $475 we're saying actually we're not weak at all we're super nutted. we need to tell a consistent story throughout the whole hand to take advantage of this player's aggressiveness.
what is more likely, that villain overbluffs turn and overbluffs river, or says hmm what can he be bluffing with here ok QhJh i'm going to call it off with a pair as a bluff catcher?
this is almost like a value bluff spot. i don't particularly like this line of bet the flop x/r the turn with one pair at all.
Last edited by ProRailbird; 09-08-2019 at 07:06 AM.