Hi all. I challenged myself in the 'Goals and Challenges subforum' to
break $30k in 30 days of $5/10 and this hand in particular has spawned a lot of debate with my friends, with their river suggestions split half and half. I'm curious about LLSNL's view regarding the river action in a live setting.
Pre: 4 limpers. I complete in SB with T8o and BB checks.
Flop: ($55) KxT
8
. Bingo. I bet $45, UTG calls, field folds.
Turn: ($145) 8x. Gin. A
K
is now drawing nearly dead. I check to induce a bet and Villain obliges, betting $120. Villain has $1090 behind so I re-raise to $350. Villain tank-calls.
River: ($845) 7
. I've over bet the river against this Villain three times in the past and there are a lot of A
X
and K
X
combos that he's never folding, so I ship, hoping that he levels himself into calling with lower flushes.
We're obviously going to showdown 100% of the time here, but the question is: should I have played the river more cautiously, going with the 'I can only get called by better' logic? A very possible J
9
becomes a straight flush on the river and Villain's UTG position makes it viable that he has KK.
So the question is: Is it worth losing value to all the A
X
and K
X
combos on the river by check-calling in case Villain has an over-full or a very possible straight flush? By checking, I also might induce bluffs by having Villain value-own himself with AA or AKo. Villain sees me as LAG and knows I over-bluff the river so he's calling with any made hand so I think it's a shove. But then again, this Villain is competent, so he won't check a flush on the river like most showdown-hungry droolers. What do you guys say?