Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
5/10 with AA 5/10 with AA

01-27-2016 , 02:48 PM
Why do we bet? To get value or to bluff? If we have value, will we get the call we want? If a bluff, will we get the fold we want. Standard stuff.

Without getting all MUBSY here, what hands does villain trap with here? 99+ pairs, correct? How many combinations of each of those hands are in play here.

When we get to the river, can he play TT this way? If so (and it is my belief based on your reads that this is correct), then this is an easy time not to CBet for villain.

If he has an A4s hand, I would kinda think he is Cbetting with his LAGGY image.....because he really would like you to fold.

These are the extremes because, well if he is trapping with 88 or a high non-pair, Gawd Bless Him. He goes to the Church of Aggression and doesn't CBet a VERY dry flop. Some LAGs (even pro) I have seen will not want to fold you out on the flop when they have a favorable flop. LAGs like to be trappy in general. Here we have zero info on Hero image. Possible he sees you as a fit/fold type?

Earlier, you explained why you did not 4! or bet flop. All sound reasons. Now take it to the next level and think about why a LAG would give up on a very dry flop.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 03:09 PM
Preflop seems ambitious. What is hero image? Pro gonna bluff stack off if it goes 3 ways?

AP, I assume the range you want to rep includes hands like AK and JJ, so I'd bet the flop. I like $60.

AP, turn bet seems standard.

AP, river, obvious call is obvious, when he tables the 33, I'd compliment him on his play.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 03:22 PM
why did you check behind on the flop? are you figuring you are ahead of his range and want him to pick up something on the turn to call you with? As played, you look like you have scaredy cat AK, so the river seems like an auto-call.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
Why do we bet? To get value or to bluff? If we have value, will we get the call we want? If a bluff, will we get the fold we want. Standard stuff.

Without getting all MUBSY here, what hands does villain trap with here? 99+ pairs, correct? How many combinations of each of those hands are in play here.

When we get to the river, can he play TT this way? If so (and it is my belief based on your reads that this is correct), then this is an easy time not to CBet for villain.

If he has an A4s hand, I would kinda think he is Cbetting with his LAGGY image.....because he really would like you to fold.

These are the extremes because, well if he is trapping with 88 or a high non-pair, Gawd Bless Him. He goes to the Church of Aggression and doesn't CBet a VERY dry flop. Some LAGs (even pro) I have seen will not want to fold you out on the flop when they have a favorable flop. LAGs like to be trappy in general. Here we have zero info on Hero image. Possible he sees you as a fit/fold type?

Earlier, you explained why you did not 4! or bet flop. All sound reasons. Now take it to the next level and think about why a LAG would give up on a very dry flop.
very nice hand reading. so.. do you think we should bet the flop when he checks to us?
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Curious
why did you check behind on the flop? are you figuring you are ahead of his range and want him to pick up something on the turn to call you with?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamKB
so, i guess big question is the flop?

check back? cbet?

i chose to check/back b/c:

1. i thought he'd fold all of his air
2. it might induce later bluffs
3. it might give him a chance to catch a pair
4. still shallow enough to give up a street of value and still get stacks in

arguments for betting?
thoughts?
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 05:04 PM
I like not betting the flop. It keeps villain's entire range in play. "More" importantly, our SPR is low enough, we can give a free street on this flop texture. If I were to bet flop...it would purely be to induce, so making it small is optimal $40-60

Sorry, he showed you quads...but you are CLEARLY ahead of range here. I think he gambled by not betting turn...but worked out well for him.

[/MUBS]


edit: If he showed with X9 (mostly A9 I am guessing, but maybe as low as T9), would betting prior take him off the hand? Do you push the flop to take him off X9.....HECK NO you don't want him folding his "almost" entire range here on the flop, amirite?

So same result. You are NOT folding given action.

Last edited by King Spew; 01-27-2016 at 05:09 PM.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 05:06 PM
lol.. he didn't show quads. but it sounds like we are on the same page throughout the hand. thanks for the discussion, king spew!
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 05:11 PM
How did he not show up with 88 - JJ here?
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 05:14 PM
i guess we've analyzed every street so i can spoiler it...

Spoiler:
he had 97s. turn and river were fairly trivial. just wanted to get opinions on pre and flop. thanks.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-27-2016 , 05:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamKB
l
villain: [/B] LAG pro. has tightened up some over past months. but is often over aggressive and makes huge bluffs when he can't rep big hands. he's a very aggressive 3bettor also
you done good, KB. You gotta call if you are confident of your read.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 03:33 AM
In general I am always 3 betting for value mainly because we are OOP. Sure stacks are shallow but we are OOP and will be 3 handed most of the time. I am not thrilled about flatting when we are out of position and think it's a 3 bet close to 100% of the time. In position I think we can flat a lot more often but it's not a default by any means.

Flatting the 3 bet really depends on our image. If we haven't 3 bet and we have a nit image it's not a terrible flat. If our image wasn't considered at all I really hate the flat call. The hand as played I think we need to be stationing but the biggest problem with the hand is we are OOP and unsure what villans actual 3 betting range is.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Doomed
In general I am always 3 betting for value mainly because we are OOP..
Reread post. There is no reason for hero to 4!, since he has position on the 3-bettor (V is SB; hero is BB).

BTW....V is not a lag pro. He's a spewing idiot.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackDoorFlush
R
BTW....V is not a lag pro. He's a spewing idiot.
not disagreeing.. just would like to understand which of his actions in this hand suggests this conclusion?
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 06:22 PM
Seems like a trivial call on the river as described
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
Snap call. Less than PSB. Your hand is soooooooooooooo underrepped.

Of course he can have some sort of 9X, A4s .....but cmon, that is such a small part of range, right?
this. the only hand that beat you is a set or some 9x hand. double snap call.
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 08:20 PM
does anyone like a bet of ~55-60 on the flop to induce a loose call or spazz?
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 08:30 PM
Your preflop cold call looks really strong. Something like TT-QQ/AK. So don't really think there are many bluffs in V's range but it's really hard to fold once you decided to underrep your hand so much.

Speaking of value hands, I think V has far more 9x in his range than A4s here as he'd definitely bet turn with A4s as a delayed cbet wouldn't have looked believable to you. Wouldn't be suprised if he turned over 99 either.

Results?
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6betfold
Your preflop cold call looks really strong. Something like TT-QQ/AK. So don't really think there are many bluffs in V's range but it's really hard to fold once you decided to underrep your hand so much.

Speaking of value hands, I think V has far more 9x in his range than A4s here as he'd definitely bet turn with A4s as a delayed cbet wouldn't have looked believable to you. Wouldn't be suprised if he turned over 99 either.

Results?
results given above.. villain had 97s
5/10 with AA Quote
01-28-2016 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamKB
not disagreeing.. just would like to understand which of his actions in this hand suggests this conclusion?
The fact that he 3! with 97s from the SB. Effective stacks are $500. He is putting in 16% of his stack with 9 high...out of position. This cannot, ever, be a profitable play.
5/10 with AA Quote

      
m