This is a hand of 1/2, which happens to be against the same drunk villain that busted out in my small flopped flush thread.
History: When sober, the villain was below average IMHO. Young, cocky, and ready to give action, but not very good post flop. In one of my first hands at the table (before I had a real good read on him), he 3bet an open I made with pocket aces. That thinned out the field, and I opted to flat. I got two bets out of him on the flop and turn, and then popped him. He showed me an ace (not the kicker) and folded on a K high board. After watching him for a couple of hours as he punded the drinks, I got the feeling he would 3bet really, really light.
Two hands earlier, he won a pot with pocket aces. The next hand he is UTG, looks down and starts laughing, and announces he doesn't want to take our money with aces again. He bets $20, the table folds, and he shows AA.
Key stacks:
Hero: $600+
Villain: $400+
I am now on the button. 5 limpers to me, I have K
K
. I raise to $17.
SB folds.
BB (Villain): raises $35 more to $52. The amount surprises me, as his 3bets were usually min raises. He just had AA back to back, and he is drunk enough that if he got it the third time, he would not be able to control himself. He is spewing, so I am thinking he maybe has some sort of ace or a PP, although some random suited cards are possible.
Folds to me, with the pot being $80.
Decision time. I feel like we should 4 bet here. He is a station, and if he happens to have something like QQ/JJ/TT, I jus can't see him laying it down. I am not sure what he would do with Ax.
If I call, the pot will be $132, and he will have in the neighborhood of $350 behind. He will have initiative, which I think is good, but his bet sizing is really bad, so getting stacks in my be tough with him leading the way.
Anyone have any strong opinions up to this point about this hand?
I opted to 4bet for $100 more. Good, bad, or ugly?
If he calls, and the flop completely bricks, do we bet if he checks, or see if we can get him to spew on the turn?