Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanishmoon
Are you implying H's turn raise was a mistake? I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. H offered V 2-1 to call turn; V should have folded his non-nutted flush draws and probably would have fast-played some his sets otf. So the crux of the discussion is whether H has capped himself at a straight/set on turn and whether H has compressed V's range to like 5 hands! (Ad4d, Ad6d, Ad2d, AdTd,6d4d). I guess my point was that he might 3b some of this range preflop and might fold one or two of them. We beat everything else, including his suited Acxs, again some of which he might have 3b pre.
I don't even think hero has any sets on the turn. TT (if it didn't 3bet pre), 55 and 33 probably raise the flop against the super small bet and 22 might have to fold anyway. OTOH hero probably has most of the XXcc combos he decided to flat pre. Maybe there are a couple that fold on the flop, but everything else calls, getting 7:1 and either having overcard(s) or straight backdoors in addition to the BDFD.
Villain donks 20% pot on the flop 4way and overbets on the turn. Hero raises 3.5x and villain flats. I have zero idea what ranges are supposed to look like here. The spot is so non-standard that it's not even really worth spending a lot of time on it yet it's so interesting that it definitely makes for a very good conversation.
Also when ranges get so narrow, every assumption we make might significantly change the outcome. If we assume that hero doesn't have any sets on the turn and only raises 64s and draws, we lose half our value range just by deciding that preflop he would have 25% fold, 50% call, 25% raise instead of 100% call (oversimplified example).
In the end, on the river there are two main questions to me:
1. Does hero ever flat XXdd on the flop and raise on the turn? If not, 64 is obviously the strongest hand in his range?
2. Does villain ever take take that line without a flush?
The real life answers to those questions might be very far away from what theory suggests they should be. We might actually have a spot where the best hand in hero's range loses to the worst hand in villains range.