Fact that this is an app game is useful information for me. Means we can use solver ranges for one thing. Second, Villain is probably making thinner value bets than I'm accustomed to in live poker.
I ran this through PIO. It took a hell of a while to compile due to the high SPR. I had to use fixed sizings on flop/turn. Gave both players two sizings on river (60% and 1.3x). Used 2.5x raise sizings on each street.
I used Jonathan Little's tournament ranges for BB vs BTN, since these are the closest approximation for ante ranges I could find (
https://poker-coaching.s3.amazonaws....lop-charts.pdf).
Flop: QT2r
OOP checks 100%, IP gets to cbet range for 1/3 sizing.
Turn: Jx
OOP checks 100%.
OOP is allowed to check/raise the turn barrel infrequently (5%). OOP turn value raises are K9 and some 98 and your bluffs are Kx suited hands (preferring the backdoor suit if it's available). OOP gets to raise 98 on turn (EV is indifferent between raise/call), but PIO strongly prefers to use this hand as a call (to protect OOP x/call range, I presume). 98 gets raised at 10% frequency, called at 90%.
River: 5x
OOP checks 100%
IP takes the 1.3x sizing with all sets, straights, QT+, Q2s is a mix between smaller and larger sizings (you were right about this)
IP takes the 60% sizing with JT and worse.
OOP check/raises facing the larger river barrel with some K9 and some 99. OOP check/calls with some K9 and other hands like QJ/98 are pure call.
IP calls with sets and two pair at a mixed frequency (IP is indifferent to calling/folding QQ-TT, QJ, QT, Q2)
IP jams over the check/raise with all his K9/AK and that's it (no bluffs)
It was interesting for me to discover that QT is nearly a pure bet on the river for the larger sizing. I wouldn't have expected that IP would be allowed to go this wide based off my live poker experience.
I think this hand plays a lot differently in the live arena cause I don't see hands like QT going for the overbet in this spot all too often.
Last edited by ChaosInEquilibrium; 09-22-2021 at 11:55 PM.