Villain 1 ($1500): Has been running well, bets with his made hands, is really in the mood to call me down, but has not gotten to showdown in about 8 hours without a made hand. Since accumulation of massive stack, he has played pretty loose pre, I’d guess playing 75% of his hands. Post-flop he will call a bit, but rarely bluffs or continues without hands.
Villain 2 ($200): ~60yr old female player who is here for fun. Said this is her relaxing time. She has bought in a few times, pretty tight-passive.
Hero ($700): 21 yr old at table with avg age >40 at the moment. I’m being active but haven’t done (at least shown) anything crazy. I am playing LAG and doing all right with it at the moment. V1 and I have some history but mainly have avoided each other as table has been weak/soft for past few hours.
Preflop: UTG limps, V1 raises in HJ to $12 (std for him), Hero calls with 3
3
OTB, V2 calls out of BB, UTG folds.
Comments: All seems standard. I think V1 raises exceedingly wide here for a 1/2 45 year old. 55+/AT+/KJs+/KQo+ at least, some SCs too, maybe some random hands. V2 calling is odd for sure, she’s been tight pre all day.
Flop ($38): 9
3
7
V2 checks, V1 checks, Hero bets $21.
Comments: V1 has c/r his made hands a ton today, usually to absurd amounts (10 to 110, 25 to 125, etc). I bet to keep V1 in with single pairs, draws, maybe AK/AQ, but also to allow myself options if I get c/r. If I get c/r here, villain has AA/KK/top 2/set ~90%, with other 10% being exclusively 8T.
V2 calls, V1 takes a moment and calls.
Turn ($101): 3
V2 checks, V1 checks, Hero…
Arguments for both exist, I wanted to hear independent views.
Checking lets them catch up, without betting here, I can't play for stacks with the deep guy.