Quote:
Originally Posted by thec0de
wj, why do you put him on a weaker range with a bigger bet? If he 4b's to 180 pre do you still play it the same way? It seems the general consensus from the more experienced posters here is that bigger bet was more likely QQ/JJ than AA. Also if the board came A high and he bets 400, what do you do? I'm just curious what would look like AA to you after you 3b to 60 and get 4b, what amount?
Something like $175-205 would look more like AA. I agree that a thinking player might go $240 hoping I have KK and am never folding, setting up an SPR where I will always stack off on low flops.
I see this all the time at $1/2 - for example, last week I'm playing $1/2 and get dealt JJ on the button. Asian woman in CO raises to $17, I flat, and another Asian woman in the SB with a stack of $105 raises to $45. Does she ever have something other than AA here? The small sizing says "I don't care what the flop is, I'm shoving if called". When they have JJ-KK, they usually just shove all-in there since they are afraid of overcards hitting the board.
I think the same thing applies here, just on a larger scale. Sure, some people will 4b huge because they don't want their aces cracked, but they usually want to draw you in. IMO his play is just terrible because the only hands calling or raising such a huge 4bet are KK and AA and he's OOP so he gets stuck cbetting all low flops and then getting jammed on by KK/AA.
If the board comes A-high and he bets $400 I just call since he probably never plays AA that way and 4betting AK that big just isn't in most people's game, other than a few of the tough LAG players at this casino that play AK like it's AA every time. Why would anyone bet $400 on the a dry ace-high flop with AA when nothing except AK (theoretically) or a lower set is going to call? Then he gets himself into a really crappy spot on the turn where I shove when he checks and I call when he shoves.