Quote:
Any reason to raise on this flop with middle set?
(All 3 players in the hand are sitting with about $2k stacks)
That's the reason. We are *very* deep here. If we have any kind of an image that isn't nit, we likely get more if we raise, even if we lose one of the customers. We are hugely deep, and pots grow exponentially. So lets make that base bigger now.
Here's a simplified example.
AP, when we call pot becomes $270. If our LAG is following the old "2/3 pot, 1/2, 1/2" formula, he will bet $135 on the turn. All call. Pot is $675. He bets $340 on the river, You raise, but they fold, so the final pot is $1695. Mind you, if we were only 100BB deep, this line would be fine, as it gets stacks in. But this deep we've left over $1400 in each of our V's stacks by slow playing.
So instead we raise flop, even though the board is dry and we're afraid of losing our customers. We make a small half-pot raise of $135. LAG folds and CO calls. Pot is $540. CO checks, we bet $390 and CO calls. Pot is $1320 and we bet $600 and get a crying call. Pot is $2520, even though we lost a customer and didn't manage to get whole stacks in.
Sure, these are just examples, and how likely they are depends on Vs and their image of us, what cards come later, etc. I definitely wouldn't auto-raise in this scenario. But the idea that we should always slow play a monster on a dry board because we might just get folds is dead wrong. Sure, sometimes they both fold. But sometimes the LAG jams on us with his surprise 72 as well. The point is, that we make so much more money when they call than when we slow-play, that it can make up for the lost EV from the the chance that they fold.