Quote:
Originally Posted by illiterat
This is one of the first hands hero played at a main table, but has played with V's previously and/or at the previous must move table.
V1 Not knowledge from before today but he had been somewhat active but mostly open limping at the must move and not normal any2 ranges, but seen him limp TT and AQo.
V2 Was also at the previous table, seemed to be playing tight and raising. Had 3bet a couple of times, but would guess he is observant enough to see people open limp.
V3 Have played with him before, and at most 2-5 tables he mostly limps tight-ish and raises big preflop (like open for 25 in the CO) with QQ+/AK. Is also not calling 15-20 opens wide.
Everyone covers hero by a lot.
On to the hand:
V1 LO: opens to 20
V2 CO: raises to 65
V3 BTN: calls 65
H SB: AKo
Hmmmm...
I guess it can't be terrible to fold and find a better spot with a better hand.
Then again, it doesn't seem terrible to want to 4B to around $250 here, depending on our stack depth. If we're short enough to jam or call off a jam (under $350-ish), or deep enough to 4B-fold to a 5B jam (over $850-ish), I think I'd prefer a raise. Otherwise, between $400 and $800 stack depth I don't mind the fold.
I don't think seeing V1 limp TT/AQo is enough of a sample to know what he does with JJ+/AK. V2 sounds capable of 3B-folding, and doesn't sound all that strong when he auto-3B's over V1. V3 doesn't sound too strong when he tank-calls after playing with his chips.
If we 4B, I would want to use a sizing that won't be called multi-way. My quick formula here was 2.5x V2's bet size, plus 1x for V3, plus another $20 for V1. Risking $250 to win the $150 in the pot seems like a reasonable gamble, while not laying great pot odds to our opponents, and could work well if our short stack reduces their implied odds.