Welcome to the forums. Feedback can be rough, so take it all with a grain of salt and if it seems like a response is a personal attack, just blow it off because it is more likely that they aren't as adept at articulating their thoughts as they are at analyzing poker hands
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokerlurch
Hero thinks V is a weak player just because V bought in for so little.
This is a bad assumption. NLHE:T&P actually suggests buying in for a small amount until you get a feel for a table. While 40 BBs isn't quite a short stack, it is short enough to make the post flop decisions easier so don't judge someone purely by their buy in amount.
Quote:
Pre Flop: ($400) Hero is SB with K 10
3 folds, Hero bets $15, V calls $10.
Seems fine, though $20 might give you more FE (Fold Equity) because villain has to call $15 to win $27 versus $10 to win $22
Quote:
Flop: (~$30) K 6 4 (2 players)
Hero bets $25, V raises to $50, Hero calls
A raise here could simply be villain trying to take the pot against a c-bet (this of course assumes villain is capable of thinking that Hero c-bets). With your preflop raise, it is fair for villain to put you on Ax (especially since TV says to steal blinds with Ax) and figure you missed the flop.
The oddity is that it is a min raise. That either means villain is scared and doesn't want to risk much, flopped a good draw and is trying to buy a free card, or villain flopped good and wants to walk the dog if you did have a king.
Quote:
Turn: (~$130.00) 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, V bets 110. What do???
This is a great scare card for villain to bet with and I think calling depends on you bankroll tolerance. If you can afford to top off your stack, I call (or if he isn't all-in push so that if he is on a draw I get it all in while I can) and see what he has so I know how to play against him.