Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) 2/4: AsKc against a reg (?)

09-15-2015 , 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
There's $390 in the pot and villain bets $165. In my book that's better than 3.3:1..
Wow... I seem to make all the mistakes today.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meale
Huh? We're not targeting anything. Facing a raise OTT, we're behind villain's range. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
You said H has 13 outs... I presume you mean that because you think H is behind (OTT).

Calling to draw here means we're targeting V's range that is ahead of Hero. That majority of that range is going to be flushes, with the discounted AQ and Q9.

So you are "targeting" V's value range when you consider your outs to call, and most of his value range is flushes (and other stuff)

When H calls the turn, and the 4th flush card hits -- even the most ******ed V's realized they are beat given H's line.

Quote:
You deflected that pretty well by giving the exact definition of a plan for the turn. Not the river.

The reality is, if you brick on the river and villain shoves, you're going to be in a situation where you're getting good odds to call. And you won't know whether to call or fold. You're simply avoiding this situation by taking the easier option in exchange for a huge chunk of EV.

You have quite possible found one of the nut worst spots in poker to be semi-bluffing in and are expecting me to believe a good player can be semi-bluffing here?

I challenge you to come up with a reasonable argument as to why semi-bluffing in this spot could possibly be good.
Your posting is evidence why V can be bluffing in this spot. You are convinced that this is such a bad spot to bluff against a nitty Hero...

I'm actually not avoiding the river situation. I'm admitting to myself that (as played) calling OTT puts H in a spot OTR where no amount of planning will help. Its going to be a bad spot (without a better read).

Since Hero's hand is actually relatively weak (its about the bottom of H's value range), and has reasonable draw to the (most likely) nuts, and V can have some (semi) bluffs here (QsJx for example) or has hands that simply will not put any more $$$ in the pot when the river hits (Kx9s or 6s5s) but will put $$$ in now, and the read on V is that he's a "good LAG" who should be looking for spots to apply pressure on a nitty Hero...

My plan for the river is to force V to make his decision now.

~~~

Preflop, V limps in the HJ, so I'm going to eliminate [TT+, AQ, KQ] from his range. Perhaps we include all the Q9s, but only 2 Q9o combos... that's 6. But we would have expected V to raise some of these OTF, so discount these again to like 3 or 4.

I think we can easily give V all SC and S1C in from QJ down. That's about 15 combos (8 SC and about 7 S1C -- not doing the exact math here).

We can give V [KJ, KT, JT], but again, we should discount these since we didn't see a raise OTF.

Therefore, the majority of V's value range is flushes.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 01:53 PM
I'm done lol. You can make whatever inferences about ranges you like. I guess if you think it's good to be semi-bluffing here then villain could be equally as delusional. In which case it doesn't matter much and this argument is futile. Interested to hear what other people say.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meale
I'm done lol. You can make whatever inferences about ranges you like. I guess if you think it's good to be semi-bluffing here then villain could be equally as delusional. In which case it doesn't matter much and this argument is futile. Interested to hear what other people say.
You seem to have problems with reading comprehension...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OP
He just lost a buy in $400 some time ago getting it in KhQh in against AdJd on a flop of Jh9h3x. He is very aggressive in my opinion, doing 50% of the raising on the table and will attack weakness, a pretty good LAG.
So what is V's range OTT then?
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 02:24 PM
I posted it in my first reply to this thread.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meale
I posted it in my first reply to this thread.
Lulz... Yeah, I thought you were not being serious in that post.

V really has AQ?
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 02:55 PM
I agree AQ seems unlikely. But I think that's more likely than the likelihood of him raising QsJx for instance. Even if you remove AQ, it doesn't change the fact villain should never be bluffing here ever. If that statement is true, then shoving turn is a mistake.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 03:50 PM
V has 2 spades. Period. It doesn't have to be Axss all the time.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by L00t
V has 2 spades. Period. It doesn't have to be Axss all the time.
V has AX exactly 0.000% of the time.

DUCY?
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapidator
V has AX exactly 0.000% of the time.

DUCY?
You misunderstood. I know Hero has the As. I'm saying he doesn't have to have the nut flush always to make it $125 OTT. He could be doing it with any two spades to keep us in (given stack sizes) because he only hates a 4th spade OTR and isn't afraid of any other cards.
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-15-2015 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meale

Your analysis of his range on the flop was actually pretty reasonable. But this ^ is pure nonsense. You "not believing him" and "pot odds" and him being a LAG are not objective reasons to act on anything.
OK, let me rephrase for you. he woke up only after we bet $60 into $145. i think it is possible he is attacking weakness, and the line he's taken corresponds to a minority of the hands i believe he could hold here. therefore, i am not 100% sure we are beat here (as some people seem to be)

"Pot odds" refer to the amount we can win vs. what we are risking. I like to consult them when considering a call. In this case, a relatively large pot vs. a relatively small bet means we can be good less than 25% of the time and break even.

"Being a LAG": i also like to consider my opponent type when considering a call. Loose: plays a lot of hands preflop. AG: aggressive. these players may, on occasion, steal a pot without a hand. crazy, i know.

Quote:

V description:

He seems fairly competent
he is a reg
plays poker for a living
He just lost a buy in $400 getting it in KhQh on a flop of Jh9h3x
He is very aggressive
will attack weakness
a pretty good LAG

V perceives hero as super tight/nitty TAG ABC type player probably.
you're *that* sure that our V doesn't see a scary board and float the flop to take it away from a super tight / nitty Hero? attacks a weaksauce turn bet, which Hero only calls?

i'm not saying i have a god-read on V, but it seems at least possible he is playing the player (us) instead of his cards. LAGs gonna LAG. of course he shows up with it sometimes here, but 80%+ of the time? i doubt it
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote
09-27-2015 , 09:11 AM
Oh yah. So I called off and V has 4s 8s here... I was very shocked
2/4: AsKc against a reg (?) Quote

      
m