Quote:
Originally Posted by Mlark
100%. Like I said in my original post, it is up to you whether you want to accept the variance of playing with a 110 blind bet woth 8-13 blinds effective and if you want to fold for 0 EV instead of make play that is slightly winning.
The only thing keeping us from ripping it in pre is that UTG is a weak player who either doesn't have the bankroll or doesn't understand how bad it is to limp 99 UTG off a 8bb stack. But that is okay, we know how to exploit him by not jamming, although it is interesting if we jam, he might make a stupid fold.
If we were first to enter the pot, we would have a very profitable jam.
What I took from that chart you posted is that we should fold or raise, either min raise or jam. And AQo is a jam.
Wondering why the two very polar sizing choices, and what makes certain hands a jam and others a fold, when some of the hands we jam seem fairly equivalent to those we min-click.
My thinking was that we wanted to min-raise just to fold out everyone left to act, while not committing our whole stack, just in case someone wakes up with AA/KK. Interesting to see the min-click hands seem to be stronger in general, which is the opposite of what I would have expected, making it seem like there's no folding once we raise, even if we min-click it. Or does the solver actually fold some of those hands to a raise here?
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk