Quote:
Originally Posted by hitchens97
But that's also a high percentage of low stakes players, which is why even though this should in theory be a really clear bluffing opportunity, bluffing randos at low stakes where you haven't seen them make big folds, is always high risk.
My big bluffs at low stakes are nearly always player dependent. Perhaps y'all can make bank making big bluffs against unknowns at low stakes, but I'm not good enough to do it profitably.
Let me revise my earlier comment.
Hero could have barreled turn, and given up / checked back on the river. I'd have liked that line better. Semi-bluffing flop and turn with an OESD is probably going to fold more hands than going bet-check-bet with our busted draws.
Would it have made a difference here, with this V, holding KK? Probably not. Because V sounds unbluffable. He flat-called a 4x 3B pre with KK, rather than 4B'ing. Sounds like a guy who likes to bluff-catch.
But if we're going to go bet-check-bet as a bluff, the ace is probably the best card we could hope for, as a lot of our AX could take that line, and a lot of V's bluff-catchers suddenly get downgraded.
Hero bet $100 into $185. It's just over half pot. Not really a "big" bluff. Over-betting pot would have been a big bluff. In fact, the bluff being so small may be why it didn't get through.
Folding KK here really isn't a "big" fold. He's losing to any ace, 2P, sets, and straights. It's only a big fold if V plays all his big PP's as bluff-catchers, because KK would be the top of his bluff-catching range on this board.