Quote:
Originally Posted by crow27
My counter to that would be if we know that Vs are only 4 bet/pushing with KK or AA and flatting a narrow range below that, I can (using my image as pretty nutted aggro bettor) C-bet almost ALL flops with A or K in them, getting QQ, and JJ to fold.
again... if your purpose is to get villain to fold QQ or JJ or whatever, why do you need TT, a value hand, to do it?
Quote:
I think most Vs SHOULD give me credit for big PP every time I 3 bet because, for most players, they'll only 3 or 4 bet with AA or KK. I can also reinforce my image as only 3 betting with KK or AA by showing the 1st and or 2nd time I get KK+ and 3 bet. This allows me to 3 bet 1010 (sometimes) and JJ, QQ and even AK more often.
this is very illogical. you're saying you'll show KK+ when you 3bet so that people will give you credit for a big PP every time.. then you say it allows you to 3bet value hands like 1010+ and AK more often. ????? would not the point of showing your KK+ (a pretty bad idea imo but thats another discussion) to be to allow you to 3bet bluff?
I need to add that Balancing your range at lower limits like 1/2 is typically not necessary. a lot of times what happens is you could end up leveling/outplaying yourself by giving Vs a little too much credit
TL;DR bet and raise your value hands, call down hands with showdown value, and bluff air hands, profit
Last edited by turtle82; 02-24-2015 at 07:58 PM.