Villain (BB): obese MAWG, 4 bet shoved 96s for $200 earlier vs me, a bit aggro and splashy (covers)
Hero (HJ): late 20s Asian guy, SUPER nit image; played one hand in last hour ($300)
Folded to hero in HJ. CO looks ready to muck. Hero makes it $12 with Q
T
. Both blinds call including villain in BB.
Flop: 9
7
6
($33)
Checked to hero. Hero bets $20. SB folds, villain calls.
Turn: 4
($71)
Checked to hero. Hero bets $45. Villain calls.
River: Q
($161)
Villain leads $40. Hero ???
I was planning to triple barrel pretty much any card that's 2-4, J+ and obviously an 8. I think given the fact that I've played one hand in the last hour and even said "don't worry guys, I'll play a hand eventually" to draw attention to it in case someone's not paying attention, I can get credit for a big hand. Plus, if an aggro villain doesn't raise me on flop or turn, he probably has a pair plus straight draw. I'm fine with him not folding flop and turn to put in a lot of money for this river spot, especially since I have up to 10 outs. Him being obese matters - obese people tend to be lazy and undisciplined which translates to loose AF preflop. This means all offsuit connectors and one gappers probably being in his range.
When villain leads for 1/4 pot on an overcard and the front door flush coming in, seems very much like a pair + straight draw that wants a cheap showdown. Question is how much to raise (with the intention to fold of course if he shoves).
EDIT: let's pretend the river was K
instead and he leads $40 also. Are we shoving to force a fold as opposed to raising smaller to price in a call (clearly being maximally exploitative and not giving any ****s about balance vs this villain).
Last edited by LordRiverRat; 07-03-2018 at 04:49 PM.