Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB 1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB

04-15-2024 , 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by docvail
V 3B and called our 4B pre. What are we worried about here?
Villain has more sets than we do. We’ll almost never have TT or 99 in our 4-betting range, while they make up a big portion of his 3-bet/calling range.
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB Quote
04-16-2024 , 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by docvail
V 3B and called our 4B pre. What are we worried about here?

Definitely not checking back flop. Probably raising turn. Definitely not folding river.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
He can have basically every hand that beats us except probably K9. Maybe discount KK though in live poker people flat 4b with KK sometimes.

We also cap our range and give him the green light to start blasting off.
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB Quote
04-16-2024 , 10:49 AM
I dunno guys. Maybe if we had a more detailed read on V, I might be worried here. I'd have to know he's capable of continuing to the flop with hands like QJs and T9s.

We didn't start deep enough for him to go set mining with all his middling pairs. 77-TT should all be folds pre, and he should be looking to 5B with KK when he's OOP. Maybe he continues with TT, but even that is pretty loose. His flatting range here is pretty compressed to QQ, AKo, and maybe a sliver of some other suited aces.

This is 1/3. Most 4B's are pretty nutted. His 3B range from the SB can be pretty wide if he's aggro, but he shouldn't be flat calling the 4B with too many hands we need to worry about on this board.

And if he had a strong hand, I'd think he'd want to get more money into the pot. Like, we'd expect him to check-raise flop or turn with a hand that beats ours.

But his turn donk is less than 20% pot. And his river bet is less than 1/3 pot. It looks like he's just trying to block bet his way to a cheap showdown.

I almost feel like hero induces this line from V when we c-bet flop for less than 1/3 pot HU. Maybe V is trying to rep QJ/T9, or some draw that got there on the turn, like J7, but it's just not credible when he calls our 4B from OOP and takes this line.

Just seems like we lost value not raising turn. V's hand looks exactly like AKo.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB Quote
04-16-2024 , 11:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by docvail
I dunno guys. Maybe if we had a more detailed read on V, I might be worried here. I'd have to know he's capable of continuing to the flop with hands like QJs and T9s.

We didn't start deep enough for him to go set mining with all his middling pairs. 77-TT should all be folds pre, and he should be looking to 5B with KK when he's OOP. Maybe he continues with TT, but even that is pretty loose. His flatting range here is pretty compressed to QQ, AKo, and maybe a sliver of some other suited aces.

This is 1/3. Most 4B's are pretty nutted. His 3B range from the SB can be pretty wide if he's aggro, but he shouldn't be flat calling the 4B with too many hands we need to worry about on this board.

And if he had a strong hand, I'd think he'd want to get more money into the pot. Like, we'd expect him to check-raise flop or turn with a hand that beats ours.

But his turn donk is less than 20% pot. And his river bet is less than 1/3 pot. It looks like he's just trying to block bet his way to a cheap showdown.

I almost feel like hero induces this line from V when we c-bet flop for less than 1/3 pot HU. Maybe V is trying to rep QJ/T9, or some draw that got there on the turn, like J7, but it's just not credible when he calls our 4B from OOP and takes this line.

Just seems like we lost value not raising turn. V's hand looks exactly like AKo.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
I played with V in one or two other sessions and he seemed competent. He’s not a regular where I play. However, we did get into a hand where he claimed to have 3! Me w 96cc from the sb. So, I’m not sure exactly how wide he’s calling my 4! Oop.
I def may have lost some value on turn. I felt like he may have had some 2 pair combos, that we were already behind, so didn’t really see the point in raising and if we’re just targeting AK, that’s a very narrow range (since K on flop and me holding two A). When he leads turn, his sizing was definitely indicative of a block bet, but could have been a bet to induce a raise (if he had a strong value hand).
I was very shocked to see AKo when we got to showdown.
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB Quote
04-16-2024 , 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weapon X-raise
I played with V in one or two other sessions and he seemed competent. He’s not a regular where I play. However, we did get into a hand where he claimed to have 3! Me w 96cc from the sb. So, I’m not sure exactly how wide he’s calling my 4! Oop.
I def may have lost some value on turn. I felt like he may have had some 2 pair combos, that we were already behind, so didn’t really see the point in raising and if we’re just targeting AK, that’s a very narrow range (since K on flop and me holding two A). When he leads turn, his sizing was definitely indicative of a block bet, but could have been a bet to induce a raise (if he had a strong value hand).
I was very shocked to see AKo when we got to showdown.
Take this for whatever it's worth...

Hand-reading is an under-developed skill at low stakes, and something you may want to work on. It's mostly about logic, but our actions can help define our opponents hands.

When facing aggression, I ask myself, "what strong hands is my opponent repping, and are those hands consistent with his actions so far?"

So, applying that logic to this hand...you raised pre from the BTN over one limp. That doesn't mean much. He 3B to >3x your open from the SB. That's supposed to be a reasonably strong range. You then 4B to >2.5x his 3B. That should be pretty strong. And he called. So his continue range here should be fairly strong, when he's calling a 4B OOP.

At low stakes, when we're playing 4B pots, the ranges become fairly face-up.

He'd probably 5B KK pre, at least some of the time. But maybe not as often at this stack depth. He MIGHT continue with TT or 99, but he'd probably fold those hands to your 4B at some frequency. He really shouldn't have any 2P on the flop. His 3B-call range pre-flop is going to be heavily weighted towards JJ-QQ, AK, and maybe some slivers of AQs/AJs.

If we think V is wide, and often getting out of line, we can assign him some SC's, but we shouldn't just take his word on it. We should see the proof in what he's shown down. Even if he did 3B light with some SC's in prior hands, was that from the SB, or LP, and did he call a 4B with them from the SB? My guess is that he might 3B light, but he's not calling 4B's anywhere near as light from OOP.

So, street by street, we're losing to sets and some 2P on the flop, but he shouldn't have many, if any sets or 2P, and all of those hands should want to raise when we c-bet less than 1/3 pot. Otherwise, we're ahead of his range that wants to just check-call here.

When he just check-calls flop, I'm taking all the sets and 2P out of his range, as well as under-cards to the board, and all the 1P hands with low kickers, like 98s. I'm just giving him a lot of TP hands, like AK or KQ, or some AX with some backdoor draw potential, like AQ/AJ.

The turn card doesn't scare me, other than thinking he might be drawing to a straight now, with AQ or AJ, or possibly he got way out of line pre with KJ. The only hands I'm thinking about here are AK/KQ that want to pot-control, AQ/AJs that want to set their own price to draw, or KJ that's feeling better now that it has the straight draw to go with its weak top pair.

I find it particularly suspicious that his turn bet is the same exact size as our flop c-bet. That smells weak. It doesn't smell like he's trying to induce a spaz-raise, because why would he?

The 8 doesn't really change anything, in that QJ was already there and could have x/r'd on the flop, and it's not all that likely we're going to have KK that wants to blast off here. We're more likely to have AK, AA, or maybe QQ - hands that might be too scared to raise. For this reason, I'd want to raise AA for value, and occasionally raise QQ as a bluff (double-blocking QJ, and not believing he's got any KK in his range on the turn), if I think he can fold TP to a raise.

This is where our actions come in. If we just flat call, we're not doing anything to define his hand. Flat calling would be fine if we had KK, and we were sure he never had AQ or AJ. But if we raise, we can get value from AK/KQ, and deny equity from AQ/AJ.

If we make it $450 to go when he bets $110, he's going to call a lot with AK, and will have to think about whether or not he wants to continue with everything else. A lot of the hands we might be worried about on the river are going to be folded out when we raise turn, so we can take them out of his range when he calls. If we raise turn, he shouldn't have AJ on the river.

As played, when we just flat call the turn, it's hard to figure out what our range now looks like. Maybe we get here with some JJ+/AK that will sigh-call this small river bet. I probably wouldn't raise now, because he could get to the river with AJ.
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB Quote
04-16-2024 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by docvail
Take this for whatever it's worth...

Hand-reading is an under-developed skill at low stakes, and something you may want to work on. It's mostly about logic, but our actions can help define our opponents hands.

When facing aggression, I ask myself, "what strong hands is my opponent repping, and are those hands consistent with his actions so far?"

So, applying that logic to this hand...you raised pre from the BTN over one limp. That doesn't mean much. He 3B to >3x your open from the SB. That's supposed to be a reasonably strong range. You then 4B to >2.5x his 3B. That should be pretty strong. And he called. So his continue range here should be fairly strong, when he's calling a 4B OOP.

At low stakes, when we're playing 4B pots, the ranges become fairly face-up.

He'd probably 5B KK pre, at least some of the time. But maybe not as often at this stack depth. He MIGHT continue with TT or 99, but he'd probably fold those hands to your 4B at some frequency. He really shouldn't have any 2P on the flop. His 3B-call range pre-flop is going to be heavily weighted towards JJ-QQ, AK, and maybe some slivers of AQs/AJs.

If we think V is wide, and often getting out of line, we can assign him some SC's, but we shouldn't just take his word on it. We should see the proof in what he's shown down. Even if he did 3B light with some SC's in prior hands, was that from the SB, or LP, and did he call a 4B with them from the SB? My guess is that he might 3B light, but he's not calling 4B's anywhere near as light from OOP.

So, street by street, we're losing to sets and some 2P on the flop, but he shouldn't have many, if any sets or 2P, and all of those hands should want to raise when we c-bet less than 1/3 pot. Otherwise, we're ahead of his range that wants to just check-call here.

When he just check-calls flop, I'm taking all the sets and 2P out of his range, as well as under-cards to the board, and all the 1P hands with low kickers, like 98s. I'm just giving him a lot of TP hands, like AK or KQ, or some AX with some backdoor draw potential, like AQ/AJ.

The turn card doesn't scare me, other than thinking he might be drawing to a straight now, with AQ or AJ, or possibly he got way out of line pre with KJ. The only hands I'm thinking about here are AK/KQ that want to pot-control, AQ/AJs that want to set their own price to draw, or KJ that's feeling better now that it has the straight draw to go with its weak top pair.

I find it particularly suspicious that his turn bet is the same exact size as our flop c-bet. That smells weak. It doesn't smell like he's trying to induce a spaz-raise, because why would he?

The 8 doesn't really change anything, in that QJ was already there and could have x/r'd on the flop, and it's not all that likely we're going to have KK that wants to blast off here. We're more likely to have AK, AA, or maybe QQ - hands that might be too scared to raise. For this reason, I'd want to raise AA for value, and occasionally raise QQ as a bluff (double-blocking QJ, and not believing he's got any KK in his range on the turn), if I think he can fold TP to a raise.

This is where our actions come in. If we just flat call, we're not doing anything to define his hand. Flat calling would be fine if we had KK, and we were sure he never had AQ or AJ. But if we raise, we can get value from AK/KQ, and deny equity from AQ/AJ.

If we make it $450 to go when he bets $110, he's going to call a lot with AK, and will have to think about whether or not he wants to continue with everything else. A lot of the hands we might be worried about on the river are going to be folded out when we raise turn, so we can take them out of his range when he calls. If we raise turn, he shouldn't have AJ on the river.

As played, when we just flat call the turn, it's hard to figure out what our range now looks like. Maybe we get here with some JJ+/AK that will sigh-call this small river bet. I probably wouldn't raise now, because he could get to the river with AJ.
Duly noted. I appreciate the in depth analysis, Doc.
This is why I post hands on here, for awesome thought out responses. Appreciate all who took time to analyze the hand and provide feed back. Love it!!
1/3 match the stack: AA on the Btn 4! Pot v SB Quote

      
m