1/3: Line check, squeezed pot, turn decision
02-17-2015
, 02:01 PM
Quote:
Hero ($250, BTN): Just moved to another table, table seems very limpy and loose/passive. Also, Hero has some history with most of these recs and has a tighty image.
V ($250, UTG+1): Loose/passive stationy rec, who stacked off to me a few weeks ago when I bet 3 streets on Q72r, V had QTs and Hero had AQs.
UTG drooler raises to $7, 4 callers including V, Hero raises to $40 OTB with AJss, only V calls
Flop ($112): Ts 6c 4c
V checks, Hero bets $60, V calls
Turn ($232): Qh
V checks, Hero ??? ($150 remaining)
V ($250, UTG+1): Loose/passive stationy rec, who stacked off to me a few weeks ago when I bet 3 streets on Q72r, V had QTs and Hero had AQs.
UTG drooler raises to $7, 4 callers including V, Hero raises to $40 OTB with AJss, only V calls
Flop ($112): Ts 6c 4c
V checks, Hero bets $60, V calls
Turn ($232): Qh
V checks, Hero ??? ($150 remaining)
Villain IMO is heavily weighted to pocket pairs after the 3!. Could be a lolawfully played AK/AQ/KQs but unless he's a total drooler, he folds worse. A reasonable range for this villain is AK-AT, KQ, QQ-22. After the flop call I imagine his range looks like TT-AA, AK-AJ
, KQ, AT, 66, 44. Obviously the question is to either empty the clip or check back and hope to bink. If this particular villain has been prone to folding to double barrels, ship. Otherwise, check back because we have zero FE. Personally, I check it back due to your description of "station-y".