Quote:
Originally Posted by diewoodchuckdie
I'm not "supposed" to c bet. I'm not the type of player who C bets every flop he raises into a 3-way pot. This flop could have legitimately missed me had I been 3-betting with KK or QQ. So the check is not unusual given the flop.
How are you playing KK/QQ here? Check/fold? How are you playing AK here? Is there any hand you bet on a flop like this 3 way OOP (there should be)? If we ever bluff on a flop like this 3 way, how can we move such a strong value hand to our check bucket and still have a strong enough value range when we get to the turn with a bet? If we never bluff on a flop like this 3 way OOP, well, we should.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diewoodchuckdie
The river queen most certainly hit one of these players. So here I'm betting to see i can get someone to play back at me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diewoodchuckdie
So I bet--I shoved.
These 2 actions do not compute....
Quote:
Originally Posted by diewoodchuckdie
My friend says I should have checked a third time, that HJ HAD to bet from position with his hand given the action ahead of him.
Your friend is right. If you are going to play your monster hands completely passively and let your opponents decide how much they are willing to pay you, you should just stick with this plan. As played, this hand looks like exactly what it is. Would a smaller bet induce? Sure, if one of your Vs has exactly QQ. Would it get a bare Q to call? Maybe, maybe not.
Look, I'm not saying this hand can't be a candidate for a slow play, it can, but only if our range is balanced here. I can tell you, against me in my game, QQ is rarely checking this flop against me and never checking both the flop and turn. The fact that QQ is willing to do this against you tells me that your opponents know too much about you.