Quote:
Originally Posted by Cbrewer4
In regards to thin value you just seem really scared of a bad turn card. It sucks for us and our value bet goes from being good like 90% of the time to being much less, but it's still going to be profitable to continue to betting in these spots
Thanks for the response.
In regards to the above - what I'm afraid of is that I bet say $75 into $100 pot on flop. V1 & 2 calls. $325 in pot.
When the 9s comes on the turn, it's ck'd to me. I bet what? If he has the flush he's looking for a c/r.
If he turned a str8 & flush draw, he could c/r me to represent the flush. This I would love, as I'm not folding.
If I ck the turn [which I would never do], I give him a free card.
When I flop the set, all of my money is going in due to the weak way V1, 2 played their hands.
If I bet $100 on the flop, SB calls with top 2 pair & UTG only gets 3:1 on his str8 or flush draw. But he's still calling with the flush draw, no. At least I made him pay.
If SB only has TPTK, he may/should fold, leaving UTG with poor pot odds to call on a draw. If he has 2 pair, I'm loving it.
I'm shoving on the turn, even if SB called. He may have called flop with TPTK with As.
Of course this all revolves around effective stacks, which I didn't mention, but we get the idea. Or do we?
I'm not saying I'm right...........I'm saying that's how I think.
You're saying that my line of thinking is not taking the "thin value" approach?