This is a hand from last night's session. I was not involved in this hand but it has left me curious.
Hero in this hand is short stacked. Probably had 50~BBs. Villain had the deepest stack at the table around 700BBs.
Hero seems to be a smart, competant player. He didn't show his cards this hand, but I can almost certainly assume he either had an overpair or flopped a made hand.
Villain is pretty TAG, but I'm using this term loosely as his aggression is very transparent. Doesn't seem to know much about pot odds - I watched him raise to only $8 from the SB after 4 or 5 limpers, and fired $10 on the flop into a pot of $50~. I assume this is how he got his monster stack, by consistantly showing weakness that was actually strength, and getting players to fight back with marginal holdings.
Villain limps in EP with T
J
. Maybe another limp or two in MP. Hero raises to $12 OTB. Villain is the only player who calls.
Flop(pot = $28) K
6
3
Villain checks. Hero bets $15. Villain calls.
Turn(pot = $58) K
6
3
Q
Villain checks. Hero bets $25(about half his remaining stack). Villain calls.
So with one card to go, Villain is drawing to the 3rd nut flush and has an OESD. He needs to call $25 OTT, with roughly $75 in the pot, with hero having $25 behind.
Should he have played this differently? I feel like playing a draw this passively vs. a short stack is a bad play. Maybe even calling pre was bad, but I guess he didn't know the players left to act were going to fold. What would you have done differently?