Quote:
Originally Posted by MarineCorpsDuck
Tough spot. You have to call $230 to win $410 so you aren't even getting 2:1. You have to be right quite often here. I would lean toward folding here, personally, but I could see myself calling if my live reads were strong and telling me he's over-valuing AA.
Let me make sure I get this straight, because I think OP is not describing the pot and stack correctly.
Effective stack is more than $400 and hero has villain cover, so at minimum, the pot should be $800 when all the money goes in, unless of course the rake is some ridiculous percentage.
So from deductive reasoning, I think the odds is $230 to win $570 or so, which is around 2.5:1.
I can't put villain on K/10, because most live players do not raise huge with the fullhouse nuts on the turn with little risk of getting sucked out. Live players also over-value K/J, and I think on the button, I would go as far as K/8 suited for villain, who's described as somewhat loose preflop.
So I would put the range of villain on K/8 suited or better, but not K/10, K/J off or better, 10/10, 3/3, and Q/J spades. Anything else is probably too loose to raise all-in, because from the POV of villain, the odds of AI given to hero on a pair board that hero check/raised is almost certainly going to SD.
Against above range, you're 1.26:1 dog. If we add A/A to the range, hero actually becomes the favor at 1.3:1. If we remove the weaker suited Kx like K8 and K9, we're 1.52:1 dog. If we remove Q/J
on top of removing K8, K9, we're 1.63:1 dog.
All of the above justifies the call for hero in this spot. Only when we remove K/J off and K/J suited are we starting to be priced out.
So the question is where do we assign the range of villain. If I were hero in this spot live, it's pretty much a call without much hesitation.