Home game, Thursday night, 10:30 p.m. ish, 1/2 NL, effective stacks $700.
I haven't played with villain before tonight. He is mid-20s Asian with a British accent (Singaporean?). He seemed loose-aggressive to me -- when a short-stack went all-in pre earlier in a multi-way pot, he over-shoved with KQ suited. Has built himself a nice stack, largely on a 3-way all-in where he had AA after limp-reraising pre. Seems positionally aware and didn't want to be OOP to me as I asked for a seat-change to his right and he immediately took my old seat.
Hero has a tighter-than-usual image due to being card-dead. One unsuccessful river bluff for $50 in position 2 hours ago. Snug otherwise and winning recently.
Two limps to villain in HJ, who makes it $12. Hero calls with J
9
. Blinds fold, one limper folds, loose-fish limper calls.
Flop ($41): K
9
4
Fish checks, villain bets $25. Hero ends up calling. Note: if we were 100 BBs deep, I'm probably raising here and happy to get it in. This deep though, I feel very vulnerable if he 3-bets and by that point, he's probably pretty far ahead (set, 2 pair, even a bigger diamond draw). Fish folds.
Turn ($91): 8
Villain bets $50. Hero raises to $170. If he called I was planning to check any non-diamond, J, or 9 river (14 outs), as I don't think he calls that raise OOP with than second pair-GK. If raised . . . my decision would be bet-size / read dependent.
Good move to fold out Kx hands while still having the redraw to a J, 9, or diamond on the river? Or bad move making myself susceptible to a 3-bet with plenty of equity? I thought a diamond might be transparent on the river after going call-call on the flop/turn and so I might not get paid if I hit the flush.
Last edited by JPeezy55; 07-19-2013 at 09:58 AM.
Reason: Number of outs was off by 1