Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 994
1/2 Game - Typical loose, passive preflop.
~$200 effective.
Hero raises to $17 from MP over one limper. with JJ.
V to my direct left calls - he has been the most active.
Flop 933r
H bets $10
V calls.
Turn 8s.
Hero $30
V calls
River As
Hero checks
V snap bets $31
Hero snap calls.
My question here starts with the flop.
I've been experimenting with betting small on flops like this, to keep more hands in, but the only problem with that is you don't know which hand you kept in!
Perhaps betting small on this flop would be better with AA since JJ needs a little protection.
I also think I should have bet more like pot on the turn?
I also did not consider that betting so small on flop could open up backdoor draws and floats.
Some people will call light, and some just play fit or fold.
This guy ended up going runner runner spades with K10ss, which makes sense.
I didn't even think about it.
Additionally, I thought his snap bet seemed fishy as the A should not be in his range except for maybe A9 soooted and he never has 3x.
ALSO, I have heard that betting quickly is a bluff tell because when people have a big hand they tend think about it.
But apparently, this guy just had some chips ready in his hand to bet if his spade comes.
Betting $31 on the river into about $100 means I don't have to be good very often, but how often am I good?
That's a hard thing to calculate unless you really know a player and even then it seems like a guess.
What bluffs can he have? Would he ever bet worse? Like 98? or K9?
Plus, they just don't bluff at these levels hardly ever.
I generally hate paying off, and if he bet bigger I would have found a fold, but it's just so hard when it's so cheap.
In general, I think a bigger on the turn would have been good especially if I saw the backdoor spades.
Thoughts?