Hero: (covers table) Dealt JcJs in mid position. Raises over two limpers to 15. V1 calls from button. V2 calls from bb.

V1 (350) - Super loose passive pre. Will call post flop with any decent draw top pair hands. Plays nutted hands aggressively though.

V2 (150) - Also loose passive. Plays much worse than V1. Calls light when he shouldn't. Makes weird bluffs. I feel like I have a pretty good idea where he is at most hands.

Flop (46) Ts9d2s. checks to hero who bets 30. V1 folds, v2 calls.

Turn (106) 3s (Board now Ts9d2s3s).

Checks to hero who bets 100 (essentially putting villain all in).

Thoughts on this line. I didn't really see any reason to slow down on the turn other than I guess to induce. That seems silly though. Does anyone bet less or check?

Why is this even a thread

You have to bet the turn with 3 cards to a flush on the board. You can't give a free card and your spade isn't high enough to check.

You should bet/fold $90 on the turn. If he raises, he only has a flush and you can fold and save $10. ;-p

Kidding of course, looks fine.

Pretty standard play and bet sizing. If pot was bigger and stacks were deeper, you may even check turn (esp since you have Js). But checking turn would be with the intention to check fold.

PF: OK
F: (3) handed. Pot is $50. SPR is 2.7 (V2) and 6.7 (V1). I'd bet closer to pot against these types of Vs. We've got blockers to the straight
T: Heads Up. Pot is $110. So the flush comes in, and we know that V "Calls light when he shouldn't", so I'm fine with a pot sized bet here. I wouldn't check. SPR is low, so stacking off is fine with our overpair here.