1/2 Borgata
Villain ($145) - 20's white kid. Pretty LP and not very aggro post. He didn't mind calling down, but didn't do much betting. I think the one exception was he bet $7/called a raise to $20 on a 642ss flop with probably A6 (he just showed the 6). Turn he c/c around $25, river was the As and it went check check. The other guy showed 77 or 88.
Hero ($500) - playing TAG (I hope). I had a small run of great hands, with AA twice in a row (showed the first time, stacked a guy with aces full the 2nd time). I also won a few other pots without showing.
1 limp
Hero (HJ) A
K
raises to $12
Villain (sb) calls $12
limper calls
Pot ~ 35
Flop K
9
2
2 checks, Hero bets $23, Villain calls, limper folds
The board is pretty dry so I went with 2/3 here. I think I can easily get stacks in vs this LP player even with this bet sizing.
Pot ~ 80
Turn: K
9
2
4
Villain donks $25, hero?
This was an odd donk. I am never folding to this bet vs this villain. I was debating whether to raise, but I figured either he just somehow sucked out 2 pair, he flopped a set and is doing a stop-and-go, or there's a good chance he has some kind of worse king that's taking a weird line.
I think if he has KT or something if I raise him he might get away from it, but if I call he'll either bet again or c/c the river and I can get more value.
There's also really no draws besides some combo of QJT gutshots, so it's not like I need to blow him off a draw.
Hero just calls $25
Pot ~$130
River: K
9
2
4
9
Villain donks $30, hero calls? shoves for villain's last $55?
I actually don't mind the 9 since I don't think it's very likely he has a 9 unless he has something like 94s that sucked out on the turn. I don't think villain would keep betting something like K4 that got counterfeited either.
He doesn't have much left, and I think he can't get away from kings at this point. Should I just shove for his last $55 or so? If villain had c/c I would have got him in on the river anyway even when the 9 hit. So is there really any difference given his line?