Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtona
So we can calculate based on the size of Villain's bet relative to the pot the % of time we have to call to ensure that betting with any two cards is not immediately profitable for Villain. This is referred to as Minimum Defense Frequency (MDF) in NL.
https://upswingpoker.com/glossary/mi...frequency-mdf/
In this case our MDF is 376 / (376 + 100) = 79%. This means we must call or raise 79% of the time, otherwise V profits by betting his entire range. Now I haven't gone too deep into the combinatorics of Hero's range (and it would be impossible to do so in real time) by the time he reaches the river, but I doubt we can fold 86 and worse and still meet this massive MDF. Thus, folding would be exploitative on our part but would expose our own range to being massively overbluffed.
Thank you for responding!
So, if I’m understanding this, if I do a quick determination of the MDF, and it’s a large number, I should be looking for ways to make a call, unless it’s truly obvious I’m a dog in the hand? Like, if I have top pair, but there’s three to a flush and four to a straight on the board that hits my opponent’s range.
From a practical standpoint, how does this differ from using pot odds? I should be calling if the pot odds are right, and my opponent benefits every time I make a decision for the wrong price.