Quote:
Originally Posted by KT_Purple
it's a slight loser for the straddler but you can make that up by playing in a bigger game and being mostly in the top 2 or 3 players at the table, so the better players should straddle and be double rolled
It is time put some logic into this argument. So here are some questions to ponder.
1. Do the best players have a greater advantage in a deep stack game or a shallow stack game?
2. Do you want to play more hands in early position compared to the button or less hands?
If you think short stack games are harder to play and position doesn't matter, then straddling will make sense to you. You're probably not a winning player if you believe that.
I know we don't have databases, but back when I was playing on-line, my villains were losing about 0.5 BB per orbit in the big blind. Translated to a live table, that means a straddle will be losing about 3 BB/hr. I don't know many players that can sustain that sized a leak. Now if you can get everyone to do it, then everyone will have that leak and it will balance out. If they aren't, that's a massive hit to your winrate.
I'm most profitable against badly thinking villains. These are the ones that think they know it all, but really don't understand what they are doing. They are just copying what other people told them. Blind size is one area. If someone is straddling to make it a "bigger" game, I know they don't understand poker. The smallest stack in a hand defines how big the game is. If you have a million BBs, but your villain has 20 BB, you're playing a 20 BB game. If you double the blind size, the game gets smaller, not bigger. People will automatically tighten up with a straddle, which is generally a bad thing to happen for winning players.
This isn't to say that there aren't some meta-game elements involved. However, I doubt you're getting a 3 BB/hr benefit from it. As a once in a while move, it isn't horrible. But if your strategy is to straddle, you could win much more not doing it.