Ugly spot with bottom set 2/5 vs fish - Page 2 - Live Low-stakes No Limit Poker Forum

The problem I limped pre was because the REG 3bets a wide range which actually would of worked out in my favor this hand big time had I of called his 3bet.

Results

Spoiler:

Quote

11-01-2017 , 03:50 PM

#28

BackDoorFlush

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 2,171

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamitontheriver

What do you suppose the calling range is for someone at LLSNL facing a five bet shove and needing to call $650 to win $1350?

Per OP's post, this is a 2/5 game with a 1k cap buy-in. Straddle is on. He was against an aggressive reg. Lol at folding KK pre.

Quote

11-01-2017 , 04:57 PM

#29

Jamitontheriver

adept

Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 1,137

Quote:

Originally Posted by BackDoorFlush

Per OP's post, this is a 2/5 game with a 1k cap buy-in. Straddle is on. He was against an aggressive reg. Lol at folding KK pre.

I didn’t say you should fold KK pre...

I’m just never five bet shoving it there and I’m pretty sure if you think hard about it you’ll figure out why.

Quote

11-01-2017 , 05:10 PM

#30

PokerPrince

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 1,814

There's just not enough superfluous info before getting to the hand in question. We need more hand histories, more stack size tracking, maybe even what every player had for breakfast.

Quote

11-01-2017 , 05:43 PM

#31

djevans

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 5,045

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamitontheriver

I didn’t say you should fold KK pre...

I’m just never five bet shoving it there and I’m pretty sure if you think hard about it you’ll figure out why.

his get it in range is TT+ - we were at an aggressive table and it was 6 max - game was decent but I was on table xfer list. Just unfortante I got that hand like 3 hands before they call my name to xfer tables. Talk about running bad - if you arn't 5bet shoving I think you are missing tons of value.

I did end up flopping top set that hand though but I can't hold

Quote

11-01-2017 , 06:35 PM

#32

sai1b0ats

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2017 Posts: 2,463

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerPrince

There's just not enough superfluous info before getting to the hand in question. We need more hand histories, more stack size tracking, maybe even what every player had for breakfast.

+1, as long as we avoid any relevant info on why the fish is a fish.

Quote

11-01-2017 , 09:10 PM

#33

the_dude_174

adept

Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 824

Quote:

Originally Posted by sai1b0ats

+1, as long as we avoid any relevant info on why the fish is a fish.

Trust me, he is defiantly a fish.

Quote

11-03-2017 , 05:29 AM

#34

Sol Reader

The Situation

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 9,380

Quote:

if you think that there is a 50% chance that he would do that, call.

... where'd you get that number from?

I'd probably raise flop a bit bigger to set up turn size that gets more calls.

As played I sigh call.

Quote:

I dont get checking the turn. I think if you have a flush there you are betting. And if V has SD with a diamond you are letting him fully realize his equity.

wat?

but we do not haf a flush??

Quote

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last