Quote:
Originally Posted by zippyroo
I mean, I felt like I gave a weak player (wouldn’t exactly classify him as a donkey) too much credit before I acted.
I think it's pretty natural for someone who posts on 2+2 to give their decisions a little thought. Clearly your read was off on not realizing he was a donkey.
If he thought your river bet was a bluff he had an easy call.
If he thought you were value-betting, pretty much no one is folding their value-betting range to his check-raise, and his check-raise therefore made no sense.
To me the most interesting part of the hand is updating your read against this player and affirming the fact that we always need to assume that a certain percentage of the time our Villain's are acting without a good reason; most often it's pointless aggression.