I little bit of background
Game is a casino run 1-2 that runs extremely deep. Max buy-in is to match the deep stack.
The only back history on image that is important in this hand is the history between me and the one Villain in the pot.
Hero: ($1400) Early twenties. Played with Villain a lot over the past year. He knows me for playing a wide range preflop and playing back at him. He knows me as the only player at the table who will 3-bet him light. In the past I have played back at him very often and shown down a few big bluffs after pushing him out of bloated pots.
Villain ($1200): Mid twenties regular. Usually the most active opener at the table. Fights for uncontested pots and c-bets large multiway (>3 way) pots when checked to in LP more often than the average player. We each view the other as thinking players (sometimes to the point of over-thinking) and highly analytical.
Villain straddles for 5
Hero UTG+1 with A
Q
Hero opens to 25
folds to Villain in straddle who flats
Flop: A
9
T
Villain checks
Hero bets 35
Villain raises to 140
Hero raises to 365
Villain flats
Turn: 4
Villain checks
Hero checks
River 5
Villain checks
Hero checks
Before I tell you what he had/my reasoning in the hand (which you may or may not agree with) I would like to know your opinions. Thank you