Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware)

06-21-2012 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevinLake
I've never had a significant sample of hands where all my pocket pairs weren't profitable hands. This is in games that were all significantly tougher, versus better opponents, than any live cash game I've ever sat in. Including up to 10/20 nl.

At llsnl, if you can't play it profitable...you suck.
from UTG?

you are a stud apparently
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-21-2012 , 11:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhcg86
no idea what you just said
Unsurprising
Quote:
but we can just agree to disagree
Lolkbro
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-21-2012 , 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhcg86
you are a stud apparently
ty.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-21-2012 , 11:19 PM
I can't believe we are arguing 22-66 being profitable UTG. I know online ranges people raise any pp UTG. But in live poker I can't see it being profitable.

On another note LeBron is about to win the championship.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-21-2012 , 11:22 PM
I think ure backwards in that theory
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-21-2012 , 11:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokahAllday
I can't believe we are arguing 22-66 being profitable UTG. I know online ranges people raise any pp UTG. But in live poker I can't see it being profitable.

On another note LeBron is about to win the championship.
Really? FR raise 22-66 UTG? Online is crazah
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-21-2012 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmckendry
Really? FR raise 22-66 UTG? Online is crazah
The reason its profitable online is because people actually respect an UTG range. So the meta game of people respecting UTG raises can be used to your advantage. Poker is still a game where your opponent can't see your cards.

Its a proven fact having pp's in your utg range online is profitable. Plenty of winners at all levels do it.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 12:25 AM
players online take notes and adjust accordingly. I really doubt playing PPs utg is profitable online.

But gimme a few days and I will find out
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokahAllday
The reason its profitable online is because people actually respect an UTG range. So the meta game of people respecting UTG raises can be used to your advantage. Poker is still a game where your opponent can't see your cards.

Its a proven fact having pp's in your utg range online is profitable. Plenty of winners at all levels do it.
So, your saying that we should raise small p/p to balance our UTG range? Does that mean we have to be prepared to c-bet/possibly barrel, when we miss our set 87.5% of the time? Keep in mind that our UTG raising range is super-tight (say less 4%).
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 12:56 AM
IM getting mixed responses on the UTG 6m and FR online
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:06 AM
Well, its compare UTG FR online to UTG FR live. I'd be surprised if opening 66-22 is standard online
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhcg86
IM getting mixed responses on the UTG 6m and FR online
Of course depending on what types of players you talk to. I didn't say every style raises small pairs UTG. But a good lag is raising 10% UTG(not top 10%), 109s, QJs and all pairs are in that range.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:14 AM
22-66 are different UTG live. Those hands should be folds unless your at a really weak table where you know your going to play so much better post-flop that its worth a raise.

Balance is such a joke live and it is the misapplied concept I see on this forum.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:18 AM
Balance used live is when you have serious history with someone, rarely is it ever needed live.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
22-66 are different UTG live. Those hands should be folds unless your at a really weak table where you know your going to play so much better post-flop that its worth a raise.

Balance is such a joke live and it is the misapplied concept I see on this forum.
GTO for llsnl and most 5/10 games is to play an exploitable game. If someone is suggesting balance they have no idea what they're talking about in live poker.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokahAllday
GTO for llsnl and most 5/10 games is to play an exploitable game. If someone is suggesting balance they have no idea what they're talking about in live poker.
I was reading between the lines of your comments and concluded that you were suggesting a balanced UTG range.

For those who say balance is irrelevant to LLSNL my response is

My response is because this a default 2+2 stance that assumes players will use "balance" as an excuse to become spewtards.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
22-66 are different UTG live. Those hands should be folds unless your at a really weak table where you know your going to play so much better post-flop that its worth a raise.

Balance is such a joke live and it is the misapplied concept I see on this forum.
sadly, the last two pages disagree
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:40 AM
If you do not balance your blinds, you are some serious whales
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:41 AM
The last 2 pages can keep 3betting 53ss and complaining when villian "put ya on AK!"
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:42 AM
Live players don't start playing optimal until 10/20 live when you have at least 6 good players at your table. You actually need balance in all aspects to counter adjust to players adjusting to you. Anybody who disagree's is either not confident in their play or need to get MUBS out of their system. Llsnl players and most 5/10 tables are just completely horrible.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:42 AM
If the table is playing tight then raise utg. Otherwise limp and hope to flop a set. Obviously this is insanely see-through to anyone good but a set live is basically the nuts and an opportunity to make nutted hands vs idiots is too good to pass up!
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
22-66 are different UTG live. Those hands should be folds unless your at a really weak table where you know your going to play so much better post-flop that its worth a raise.

Balance is such a joke live and it is the misapplied concept I see on this forum.
No one is making a balance argument. They're saying you make a **** ton of money when you flop a set 4-5 way. It'd be a terrible play if villains are good, but they hardly ever are.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrTJO
So, your saying that we should raise small p/p to balance our UTG range? Does that mean we have to be prepared to c-bet/possibly barrel, when we miss our set 87.5% of the time? Keep in mind that our UTG raising range is super-tight (say less 4%).
I was replying to this...
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
No one is making a balance argument. They're saying you make a **** ton of money when you flop a set 4-5 way. It'd be a terrible play if villains are good, but they hardly ever are.
And they are trying to argue that you dont make more raising than you would by simply folding, lets see some math.
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote
06-22-2012 , 01:57 AM
basically impossible to see math for live cause there is no tracking system (obv)
Starting hands in UTG (Reader beware) Quote

      
m