Hey guys, thanks for the responses.
I lead turn because I didn't want it to check through, still liking my hand a lot, and thinking original bettor who bet $6 would likely check to the station on the button, and no more money would go in the pot. Because I was guaranteed to get called by the button for $25, I wanted to bet here, even though we could be beat, we still have decent equity.
Arguments for checking river are very valid, however, by thought process was largely dominated by the player on the button, not the BB (which is incorrect). I value bet here 100% sure I would be called by worse by the button, and if hte BB had us beat, so be it. I didn't want to risk this checking through.
This is actually very interesting, and something I will consider in the future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supd001
If you c river bb probably bets $75 and button calls thinking you're folding. Something like that is easy overcall for me given reads. In paired board three way action on river I try to get non believer to call other paired card holder's bet if possible based on position.
Having good relative position on the BB, a check here could be good if I'm sure he'll bet. If he's going to check a hand like TT or something though we miss a lot of value.
Results: We bet $70, BB shoved for $150, Button called, and we sigh called. He had Q4hh and we shipped it. The reason I posted was in a vacuum I really believed this was a bad call. We beat QT, but I really believed that all other Q's would just call, except for boats. I thought he was simply
never shoving worse. Obviously I was wrong, and shipped a nice one.