Quote:
Originally Posted by AintNoLimit
Horrible play. And winning it was bad overall since it will confirm your validity to how you played the hand im assuming.
You flip with any hand as weak as QJo and are crushed by all other. And V isnt folding anything he made it 160 with IMO.
If V doesn't have a pair, then the worst shape I can be in is 70/30 dog and the best 50/50 you're right. This by no means is a standard play or something I plan on making a habit of. The V had to have put me on AA, KK, QQ or TT. With my tight image at the time, the V doesn't think I'm capable of bluff re-raising his flop bet. I also believed V was only ever shoving with a draw rather than a made hand.
If we put ourselves in the villains shoes, Vs equity against my perceived range (AA, KK, QQ or TT) is 50%, and if I actually do have a set then he's the dog 60/40. The hand that I actually have ended up being his best case scenario equity wise for him, and is a hand he never would put me on...
So my question is, if you were the V, how would you have played the hand against hero? What range do you put hero on? Is it a good play for him to play for stacks with 50% equity against hero's perceived perceived range (if above range is correct)?