Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Winrates, bankrolls, and finances
View Poll Results: What is your Win Rate in terms of BB per Housr
Less than 0 (losing)
5 6.41%
0-2.5
0 0%
2.5-5
6 7.69%
5-7.5
8 10.26%
7.5-10
15 19.23%
10+
26 33.33%
Not enough sample size/I don't know
18 23.08%

02-03-2016 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cAmmAndo
Do you bounce after doubling through and rebuy short again or continue to play deep?
I stay and try to adjust to deeper stacks. Typically I start thinking about bouncing to a new table or 2/5 when my stack starts approaching 500.

I am fairly risk adverse by nature, so I am more than happy to lock up a nice profit, even if it comes at the expense of a MONSTER day.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 02:47 PM
What is tight and splashy
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackInDaCrak
What is tight and splashy
Wait and jam. No limping or other small ball calls. If you're in the pot you're in it for a stack. Probably.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angrist
Wait and jam. No limping or other small ball calls. If you're in the pot you're in it for a stack. Probably.
It has its merits. There is a reason why online has pro short stackers. It can be profitable. For a large majority of the poker playing population, it would be too boring. You outlined the basic way to play it correctly, which most people who short stack do the exact opposite.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackInDaCrak
What is tight and splashy
When I am in a pot, I am in it to win it.

I can push any percieved edge without worrying about tough decisions on later streets.

I can play top pair, top kicker like the nuts.

I can play AK way stronger than in a deep stack game. Queens and Jacks aren't trouble at all!

Pot comittment isn't an issue, it is a way of life.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aust1227
I have something to admit. I play short!! I buy in for $100 at 1/2 NLHE.

My win rate since I started logging house is $26.88 Per hour ($93.76 STD), total of 240 Hours. Biggest single win was a measly $682, and the biggest single table loss was $300.

I hear all of the 2+2 Mafia lauding over the benefits of deep stack play. But, I love playing a very tight, splashy short stack game..

When short, I feel like i have a huge advantage over the loose passive regs at the local games. They always seem to be calling their draws with almost ZERO IO.

Am I leaving money on the table? Anyone else enjoy short?
Unless you're always cashing out after you hit 100bb, you're not really playing short much.

Starting short and permanently playing short are not the same.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathCabForTootie
Most of the "2+2 Mafia" would probably do better by buying in shorter but it all depends on previous reads, dynamics, etc.
Posting on 2+2 doesn't make you a winning player.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aust1227
I am fairly risk adverse by nature, so I am more than happy to lock up a nice profit, even if it comes at the expense of a MONSTER day.
Most people don't understand risk and like the idea of "locking up a win."

Not saying you have a win cap, but if you do, you better have a loss cap, too.

If your win cap is 200bb, and you don't have a stop cap, for every -400bb session, you need minimum of 2 winning sessions just to come out even. Think about the long term consequence of such scenario.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker
Posting on 2+2 doesn't make you a winning player.
Now you tell me
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angrist
Wait and jam. No limping or other small ball calls. If you're in the pot you're in it for a stack. Probably.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny_on_the_spot
It has its merits. There is a reason why online has pro short stackers. It can be profitable. For a large majority of the poker playing population, it would be too boring. You outlined the basic way to play it correctly, which most people who short stack do the exact opposite.
Works online because you can cash out and multi-table.

Can't do it in live.

Plus your pool probably has to be big enough for people not to start really hate on you.

People who do shady things always say that they don't mind the hatred, and I can see why they don't, but do YOU want to be one of these guys?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhNoHeDi'int
Very interesting. You hear so much about the advantages of deep stack but I wonder if it's overestimated at these stakes. As someone who doesn't quite have the bankroll for full buy-ins live, this makes me optimistic about buying in for less than max.

Any posts/books/strategy you found for starting short stack?
If you're a better player, deeper stack becomes an advantage.

If you're not, bigger the stack, bigger the risk.

All depends on where you sit on the spectrum.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aust1227
When I am in a pot, I am in it to win it.

I can push any percieved edge without worrying about tough decisions on later streets.

I can play top pair, top kicker like the nuts.

I can play AK way stronger than in a deep stack game. Queens and Jacks aren't trouble at all!

Pot comittment isn't an issue, it is a way of life.
Good way to get started with a short BR, but pretty horrible way of playing for everyone else.

Plus here are few inherited problem of playing in such way:

Quote:
When I am in a pot, I am in it to win it.
Optimal poker isn't about winning every pot; it also requires making good folds. Can't do that with a short stack.

Quote:
I can push any percieved edge without worrying about tough decisions on later streets.
Most profitable streets are on turn and river, the two streets that you are avoiding/missing.

Quote:
I can play top pair, top kicker like the nuts.
Super high variance for obvious reasons.

Quote:
I can play AK way stronger than in a deep stack game. Queens and Jacks aren't trouble at all!
Goes back to the same notes above. You often play them "too strong" because of your stack size and mostly missing value against weaker hands.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 03:47 PM
Most 1/2 and a lot of 2/5 games play like a short stacked online game anyways... even if you buy in for 100bbs.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 04:03 PM
I don't think about grass on the other side.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker
Posting on 2+2 doesn't make you a winning player.
Quote:
Originally Posted by suited fours
Now you tell me
heeeee!!!
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 04:25 PM
I suppose it speaks to my skill level, but I also enjoy the easy decision making that comes with a 100bb stack or facing opponents with less. Not a lot of tough decisions to make.

I don't play much online cash, but imagine that 100bb stack online plays more like a 200bb stack live considering live opens are usually 5x-8x at 1/2, while online it's closer to 3x.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StreetH
I suppose it speaks to my skill level, but I also enjoy the easy decision making that comes with a 100bb stack or facing opponents with less. Not a lot of tough decisions to make.

I don't play much online cash, but imagine that 100bb stack online plays more like a 200bb stack live considering live opens are usually 5x-8x at 1/2, while online it's closer to 3x.
Not exactly, while preflop opens are on steroids compared to online, the later streets tend to have lower percentage of psb.

People live tend to feel "big" bets are based on dollar amount, not relation to the pot. You'll often see a bet of like $250 into a pot approaching $1000 and people will fold because $250 is a lot of money to them
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 04:34 PM
True. Good points
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 05:54 PM
Does anyone call Kansas City their home market? How would u describe the games?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 06:01 PM
Wrong forum.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 06:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker
Wrong forum.
I thought u of all people might say that.

I just spent the last 2 weeks reading this entire thread, and I wanted to ask what kinds of winrates the good KC players are achieving but I thought that would get flamed on. So I don't really think it is the wrong forum.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 06:12 PM
Tree fiddy/hr.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Parker
Tree fiddy/hr.
So that is how u get 12k posts in 3 years? 2 posts in response to someone looking for insight and u have provided no substance...good work.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 06:21 PM
My answers can only be as good as the questions.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
02-03-2016 , 06:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJIMMY10
I thought u of all people might say that.

I just spent the last 2 weeks reading this entire thread, and I wanted to ask what kinds of winrates the good KC players are achieving but I thought that would get flamed on. So I don't really think it is the wrong forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJIMMY10
So that is how u get 12k posts in 3 years? 2 posts in response to someone looking for insight and u have provided no substance...good work.
I'd suggest posting in the KC sub-thread under 'Live Casino Poker' for better answers. TBH I don't think a ton of KC players post in this thread.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote

      
m