Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Winrates, bankrolls, and finances
View Poll Results: What is your Win Rate in terms of BB per Housr
Less than 0 (losing)
5 6.41%
0-2.5
0 0%
2.5-5
6 7.69%
5-7.5
8 10.26%
7.5-10
15 19.23%
10+
26 33.33%
Not enough sample size/I don't know
18 23.08%

12-18-2015 , 11:34 AM
Yeah, I've played ~40-50 hours of 2/5 at Parx and already gotten in 200BB (&~150BB a good few times as well) in a limped pot..against a guy with a Q high flush... on a paired board, and he would have gotten more in if I had more behind.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-18-2015 , 12:18 PM
Heh, I put in about 175 BBs with 77 on a QQT54 board maybe 30 table hours ago.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-18-2015 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sneaky Pete
Nobody said anything about real or fake pros.

It's great that you don't lie about your results.

GOOD JOB!
shrug, sounds like you lie about your results to yourself and now ur getting upset?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-18-2015 , 03:06 PM
Why would I be upset?

It would seem that such distinction has more effect on you, enough so that you brought it up using yourself as comparison.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-18-2015 , 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by t_roy
Don't think so, but possible. Miller's strat in the Vegas games is to basically hit the nuts and get paid, or take a ton of pots away from Vegas nits when they cap their ranges. I can see how this range is in line with that general strat. Again, Vegas is special.
How much more to poker is there regardless of location?

Unless you're saying he's saying he can't do both, it's one or the other.

I don't know why you can't do both though.

Win the max. when you have the best hand against a strong 2nd best hand.
Lose the min. when you have a strong 2nd best hand against a better hand.
Win pots when no one in the hand has anything.

Those are the tent poles of winning at poker.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-18-2015 , 03:12 PM
SP and HLB, let's just stop this impending micturation competition in its tracks.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-18-2015 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldiesel
How much more to poker is there regardless of location?

Unless you're saying he's saying he can't do both, it's one or the other.

I don't know why you can't do both though.

Win the max. when you have the best hand against a strong 2nd best hand.
Lose the min. when you have a strong 2nd best hand against a better hand.
Win pots when no one in the hand has anything.

Those are the tent poles of winning at poker.
Agreed.

If you took examples in Miller's book in their literal meaning, you're missing a ton of value.

Range provided in the book should be used as a baseline and readers are to adjust in accordance to game condition.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 03:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldiesel
How much more to poker is there regardless of location?

Unless you're saying he's saying he can't do both, it's one or the other.

I don't know why you can't do both though.

Win the max. when you have the best hand against a strong 2nd best hand.
Lose the min. when you have a strong 2nd best hand against a better hand.
Win pots when no one in the hand has anything.

Those are the tent poles of winning at poker.
Sure, he just advocates it to an extreme in the vegas games. He wants to hit the nuts and hope to cooler or blow people out with over bets. From what i've heard, you're typically not able to get a ton of value with med strength top pair hand like you are at maryland live. This could lead me to play hands that can hit the nuts or nothing. Basically, if you don't have the nuts you're gonna end up bluffing. Based on squid, it seems like it's all bull **** from miller though.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 03:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kookiemonster
Me too. I guess I make $20-$40/hr worth of obvious, correctable mistakes @ a $1/2 $500max level.

How much am I leaving behind at $2/5? $5/10?

What about all of the small edges I don't yet see with my current skill level?

It is a sobering thought.
The scariest thing about getting better at poker is that you know enough to realise how bad you still are
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
The scariest thing about getting better at poker is that you know enough to realise how bad you still are
QFT
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
The scariest thing about getting better at poker is that you know enough to realise how bad you still are
All the more reason to stop trying to get better.

The more you know. Jpg
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoltan
All the more reason to stop trying to get better.

The more you know. Jpg
QFT?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 04:54 PM
Quoted for truth
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 04:54 PM
Or in this case maybe: quoted for troll
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by t_roy
From what i've heard, you're typically not able to get a ton of value with med strength top pair hand like you are at maryland live.
That's not a geographic thing, it's a new vs old thing. I guess they're related. Maryland doesn't have pros living there yet, LV is saturated with pros and decent rec players. If there's an opportunity for profit people will enter the market until it goes from everybody profiting to everyone breaking even, and then the entrance into the market will stop. There hasn't been enough time for people to enter in ML yet.

I don't particularly like Miller's articles, but I hear guys categorized as winning a ton of small pots or winning a few big pots. It is possible to do both.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-19-2015 , 06:49 PM
I've been figuring out soft casinos I could visit for a few weeks to scope out somewhere to move to for at least a couple months. I just took a trip to Vegas and it was pretty good but there are def a ton of grinders.

So ML would be a suggested place to check out I suppose
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-20-2015 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YGOchamp
I've been figuring out soft casinos I could visit for a few weeks to scope out somewhere to move to for at least a couple months. I just took a trip to Vegas and it was pretty good but there are def a ton of grinders.

So ML would be a suggested place to check out I suppose
Where are U playin' now? If it's not so soft, I don't want to make the mistake of going outta' my way to visit. Thanks.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-20-2015 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldiesel
Maryland doesn't have pros living there yet.
Are you drinking or smoking?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-20-2015 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt
Where are U playin' now? If it's not so soft, I don't want to make the mistake of going outta' my way to visit. Thanks.
Its a pretty soft area but we only have 2/5 or 5/10 games running 2-3 times a week. I'm burnt out on grinding 1/3 but I need to put in more hours.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-21-2015 , 01:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldiesel
That's not a geographic thing, it's a new vs old thing. I guess they're related. Maryland doesn't have pros living there yet, LV is saturated with pros and decent rec players. If there's an opportunity for profit people will enter the market until it goes from everybody profiting to everyone breaking even, and then the entrance into the market will stop. There hasn't been enough time for people to enter in ML yet.

I don't particularly like Miller's articles, but I hear guys categorized as winning a ton of small pots or winning a few big pots. It is possible to do both.
Not sure this is fully true. Based on what I've heard from other areas, MDL isn't abnormal at this point (first year it was). I think Vegas is the real exception. It became a place for poker enthusiasts to go, and just created a total nit fest. Also cost of living and rake is cheaper than maybe any other major poker market. Makes things more pro infested as you don't need to win as much to stay afloat.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-21-2015 , 02:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by t_roy
Not sure this is fully true. Based on what I've heard from other areas, MDL isn't abnormal at this point (first year it was). I think Vegas is the real exception. It became a place for poker enthusiasts to go, and just created a total nit fest. Also cost of living and rake is cheaper than maybe any other major poker market. Makes things more pro infested as you don't need to win as much to stay afloat.
And rakeback.
Youre basically freerolling food.

YGO I feel you. Good luck in your decision
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-21-2015 , 08:35 PM
Hi guys just started playing live full time $2/$5 this past week. I Have been playing (seriously) 100hrs per month for the past 4 months and this is something I've wanted to do for some time now. Just wanted to post my graph/stats to get some feedback on how sustainable my w/r is and/or what should I be aiming for. Appreciate all replies thanks in advance!

Note: the first graph/stats is a mixture of $1/$2 home games $2/$3 casino & 2$/$5. The second graph/stats is solely $2/$5.







Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-21-2015 , 08:45 PM
^ Other players at the same limits have sustained similar winrates over large sample sizes but your sample size size is too small to know whether or not your winrates are sustainable for you. You'll probably need around 1k hours minimum to get a rough idea of your own winrate. Gl
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-21-2015 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pipedreamer101
Hi guys just started playing live full time $2/$5 this past week. I Have been playing (seriously) 100hrs per month for the past 4 months and this is something I've wanted to do for some time now. Just wanted to post my graph/stats to get some feedback on how sustainable my w/r is and/or what should I be aiming for. Appreciate all replies thanks in advance!

Note: the first graph/stats is a mixture of $1/$2 home games $2/$3 casino & 2$/$5. The second graph/stats is solely $2/$5.







55/hour isn't outlandish, but be honest with yourself, are you one of the best players in the room? Are you consistently the best or maybe 2nd best player at the table? If yes, there is a chance that could be sustainable. If no, then maybe you're just on a heater and will slow down eventually. Regardless, it's a couple of nice graphs, so congrats.

Out of curiosity, what app is that, I like the look of it. How do you find the interface? Would you recommend it?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
12-21-2015 , 08:55 PM
Without much table selection (there's only ever 2/3 tables of $2/$5 running during weekdays) I'm easily top a 3 player in any given line up. The app is called "Run Good" it's for iPhone only though... I definitely recommend it! It has some really good features and the graph/stats layout are very clear and easy to understand.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote

      
m