Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Winrates, bankrolls, and finances
View Poll Results: What is your Win Rate in terms of BB per Housr
Less than 0 (losing)
5 6.41%
0-2.5
0 0%
2.5-5
6 7.69%
5-7.5
8 10.26%
7.5-10
15 19.23%
10+
26 33.33%
Not enough sample size/I don't know
18 23.08%

09-26-2012 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenT07891
SD = SQRT((Riemansum of (x-xmn)^2))/(n-1)), right?

I have an excel file of each session, the time per session, and the win/loss for the session. For the equation, x is the winrate for that session alone. Xmn is my overall win rate for my entire career. n is the number of sessions minus 1.
I think that statistic needs to be weighted by the length of the session. You need something that has units of $/hr at the end, not $/session.

Don't remember the formula, but it's gotta be on wikipedia or something.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatoKrazy
You can't be serious???

I've lost 8 buyins in a day at 1/2 multiple times and am a huge winner in the game. Do you play extreme nit or something?
12 - 13 buyins would be a pretty hefty downswing for 1/2 NL and will rarely happen to any reasonably good player. It's possible but unlikely that anyone who is good enough to be playing professionally is going to drop $2500 during a 1/2 NL downswing.

8 buyins in one day in 1/2 NL is insane.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Brice
Wow, I am only 28 so that must have changed since I after I graduated shortly after college. But I do know some guys who still live at home who are my age and the amount of tail they pull-in is virtually non-existent.
Depends on area of the country. Maybe not 28, but plenty of people in my area (NY) and surrounding extremely-high-cost-of-living states often live at home until 24, 25, 26. I lived at home until I was 23 and off the top of my head so did every single woman I dated anywhere around my age.

I would certainly imagine it is different in other areas of the country where cost of living is much lower.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
12 - 13 buyins would be a pretty hefty downswing for 1/2 NL and will rarely happen to any reasonably good player. It's possible but unlikely that anyone who is good enough to be playing professionally is going to drop $2500 during a 1/2 NL downswing.

8 buyins in one day in 1/2 NL is insane.
Ummm ya...that's what I thought.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Brice
For those of you who are advocating this guy trying to be a pro, how old are you? Rob is pretty young and I am guessing Sol Reader is as well. I would like to hear someone with 20+ years of playing pro poker advocate that this give it a shot. Of course, sample size is tiny for that because so few people have done it.

I am siding with 2Outs on this one. It is logical thing to do, especially if you have any sort of education. There is nothing better than knowing you have a job to cover you and the play poker on the weekends when the games are so much better. As someone said earlier in this thread, I can show up hungover, half asleep and surf the web and still get my hourly rate of around $40 plus benefits plus retirement etc etc.

If you get the right job, you don't have punch a clock. I can come and go as I please, as long as get my work done, sort of like playing poker.
Thank you, appreciate the support. There's no law that says that between the weekends and 1 night a week he can't get in 15-20 hours of play for supplemental income anyway.

As far as the age commentary, you are correct, virtually every time we see one of these threads, the person wanting to turn pro, and those advocating they do, are always in their early 20's or lower. Rarely are you going to see anyone several years beyond college age advocating vaulting into the deep end of the poker pool.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 07:27 PM
I'm not planning to "go pro" or something. Just take a shot and keep playing for maybe 8 hours/week or so (while I was a full time student, this is what I did for about 2 years). No reason I can't keep a full time job and play poker at the same time.

So is that Risk of Ruin formula correct?

And what is you guys standard deviations? Why does mine seem off? Btw, it is in units of $/hour not $/session.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
12 - 13 buyins would be a pretty hefty downswing for 1/2 NL and will rarely happen to any reasonably good player. It's possible but unlikely that anyone who is good enough to be playing professionally is going to drop $2500 during a 1/2 NL downswing.

8 buyins in one day in 1/2 NL is insane.
I understand it is insane, but even if I am a statistical outlier it is clearly possible. If you have a big enough bankroll that you are willing to keep rebuying and not play scared money (which I do) and you run really really bad you can lose a lot of money in a day. You can also win a lot of money in a day, as evidenced by my last session (+8 buyins at a 100BB max table in about 6.5 hours.)
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 07:44 PM
If you play enough poker, crazy downswing will happen.

I have less than .2% RoR and I hit it. Did I play bad? Probably.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 07:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
12 - 13 buyins would be a pretty hefty downswing for 1/2 NL and will rarely happen to any reasonably good player. It's possible but unlikely that anyone who is good enough to be playing professionally is going to drop $2500 during a 1/2 NL downswing.

8 buyins in one day in 1/2 NL is insane.
Hefty?, yea.
Rare?, Hell yea.
Possible? Absolutely.

I just rode through a $5500 downswing at $1/2-$1/3 (mostly $300 max $1/2), over the course of about 230 hours. I won't claim to play professionally, I'm just a rec player supplementing my meager student existence, but I've got winning results over a nearly 3000 hour sample.

When I went through my records trying to figure out the downswing, about $1500 was due to clearly bad decisions (poor reads, fuming tilt plays, poor game selection). About $3000 (~ 10 BI) was due to cooler hands, top set in on the flop and outdrawn, K-high flush is no good, guy rolling quads, etc.

So it's possible to run really badly and drop a lot of BI's, and it's even easier to compound that with tilt (regardless of how good you are). But I don't think it should prevent someone from taking a shot with a stoploss of $1000 or so.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 08:16 PM
Question: Is my risk of ruin smaller if I buyin for $100 every time (it's a $1/2 game) rather than buying in full($200)?

Or is there no difference?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 08:56 PM
How much you buy in will probably affect your STD and WR, and thus it would impact your RoR.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Brice
For those of you who are advocating this guy trying to be a pro, how old are you? Rob is pretty young and I am guessing Sol Reader is as well. I would like to hear someone with 20+ years of playing pro poker advocate that this give it a shot. Of course, sample size is tiny for that because so few people have done it.

I am siding with 2Outs on this one. It is logical thing to do, especially if you have any sort of education. There is nothing better than knowing you have a job to cover you and the play poker on the weekends when the games are so much better. As someone said earlier in this thread, I can show up hungover, half asleep and surf the web and still get my hourly rate of around $40 plus benefits plus retirement etc etc.

If you get the right job, you don't have punch a clock. I can come and go as I please, as long as get my work done, sort of like playing poker.
Agree with this. Try to find a job that's somewhat flexible (maybe part-time), but you're going to want a steady income coming from somewhere, as well as the aforementioned resume builder.

Treat poker like a serious hobby, and it'll work out fine. Most people have 15 free hours or so per week; instead of going out drinking as much, or playing video games, or watching much TV, read and study and you'll make decent money.

If you really can't find a job that allows you to play poker seriously, get an unpaid internship somewhere that's going to help you. Do that 20/hours per week, and if your winrate is good enough, you'll have enough money to live on while proving your value to a company. Then in six months when you have your downswing, you'll hopefully have a fount of experience and skills to show to your employer.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-26-2012 , 09:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by styx2000
i've had 3 buy in downswings in single hands
lol but this x eleventen thousand.

I just lost a 4k pot 2/5 to a fishes 2 outer in which we got it in on the turn.

Downswongs and ka - razy stuff can and will happen in a fierce firestorm and u gots to have the roll to withstand this
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 12:14 AM
I just hit 1,000 hours of play since Black Friday. Thought I'd share how its gone as I've adjusted to playing live part-time.

60% 1/2
15% 1/3
25% 2/5



1/2: 600 hours at $18/hour
1/3: 165 hours at $22/hour
2/5: 245 hours at $42/hour


I hope the next 1,000 hours I can stick at 2/5 and do well. I've never really played live before BF, but I'm guessing 1,000 is still a pretty small sample.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 01:00 AM
Was this played in vegas?

How about breaking down the STD/hour for each limit. Thanks.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 02:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by parisron
Was this played in vegas?

How about breaking down the STD/hour for each limit. Thanks.
This was mostly played in various casinos and charity rooms in the Southeast Michigan and Northwest Ohio areas with a few trips to Vegas.


STD/hour:


at 1/2: $218 over 593 hours
at 1/3: $288 over 163 hours
at 2/5: $457 over 245 hours


I think I am running well at 2/5 which does inflate this graph a bit. I hope to hit 500 hours there by the end of the year.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 06:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazonPrime
Ummm ya...that's what I thought.
I dunno I've had some pretty big losing days at 1/2. It depends on how big the avg stacks are.

I don't understand how people can not have had 300bb downswings. That implies you've rarely been 300bbs effective.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 07:00 AM
My STD at 1/2 is 335, 1/3 2/5 is 832, 5/10 plus is 1142. So basically about 120-150bbs. Higher std with higher buyin. (my 2/5 BI is usually about 1k to 1.5k. 2-5k for 5/10).

I guess it's surprisingly low std for 5/10, but as I've said I just run good. ez gamee.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 09:33 AM
Your 2/5 game structure is also a lot bigger than an average 2/5 game in the states. Essentially your 2/5 is more like a 5/10, which helps to make your WR so high relative to what you read about an average WR. I suspect that you probably know that already.

That's why I proposed in an earlier post that there should be a criteria before posting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazonPrime
I think there should be a criteria for posting your WR.

For example:

BI format: 40bb - 100bb, etc.
Rake/drop: $5 flat or $4/$2, etc.
Average number of tables: weekday or weekend.
Sample size: 800 hour or what not.

Then it would be much easier to compare apple to apple.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 09:52 AM
What buyins do most 2/5 games have in the states? The 2/5 in Australia and equiv in Macau have 200bb buyins too.

I do think it's deeper, and yeah I think that impacts the hourly significantly, but I didn't think it was THAT much deeper. I've seen pretty deep stacks in games elsewhere too.

Except for those 5/10 games. Those are crazy.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 10:23 AM
at my casino $2/5 is 40-100BB

max rake of $4 + $1 BBJ, so it's $5 for most pots

min rake is $1 for flop seen, but at $2/5 it's basically always gonna be $3 min, because it's $2 at $10+ pot and the BBJ kicks in at $12 which is always gonna be the case, since SB/BB usually chop.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 10:26 AM
2/5nl at Tampa Hard Rock is 40bb-120bb buy in, the bigger buy ins start at 5/10 which is 50bb-500bb.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 10:30 AM
How do yall calculation standard deviation?
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenT07891
How do yall calculation standard deviation?
Its not very easy, Poker Journal on my Iphone does it for me.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote
09-27-2012 , 11:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol Reader
What buyins do most 2/5 games have in the states? The 2/5 in Australia and equiv in Macau have 200bb buyins too.

I do think it's deeper, and yeah I think that impacts the hourly significantly, but I didn't think it was THAT much deeper. I've seen pretty deep stacks in games elsewhere too.

Except for those 5/10 games. Those are crazy.
The average BI for typical donks in your game is probably 2-3x bigger than the average BI of donks here at the same stake.
Winrates, bankrolls, and finances Quote

      
m