Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Official "It Lives, It Lives" Chat Thread*** ***Official "It Lives, It Lives" Chat Thread***

10-03-2018 , 05:12 PM
Assuming Evil Knievel onesie with cape and crash helmet.

Ggogogo!G
10-03-2018 , 05:26 PM
Squid didn’t amass his riches and now able to essentially retire flying the skies by making bad bets bruh
10-03-2018 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by miamicheats
I’m interested to wager at 2:1 for 2 months pending there is no buyout for injury. That’s part of the risk or training and cutting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm interested in playing defense on the double or nothing round.
10-03-2018 , 06:16 PM
Damnit! At the tire shop again after hitting another vicious pothole. At least I was able to drive to the shop this time instead if getting a blowout on the Interstate.
10-03-2018 , 06:17 PM
Hell I’m 6’1” and I could dunk with room to spare... 25 years ago.

3-1 and 3” shorter seems reasonable unless he was some kind of high jumper in college or something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-03-2018 , 06:56 PM
I’m a fat, white, ex baseball player


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-03-2018 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
Y’all are wild. I’m fat, white and have never dunked.

I want 3-1 on 2 months. How about the injury clause is just something unrelated to basketball. I.e I get hit by a car or break my face at softball or something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Not interested at that rate. If you are interested in 2-1 hit me up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-03-2018 , 11:02 PM
That injury clause is weak sauce. Sacrificing softball to avoid injury in order to fulfill the effort is part of doing what it takes to win the bet, especially at 3-1.
10-04-2018 , 12:05 AM
An injury clause covering events unrelated to training seems reasonable. No one is looking to take advantage of something out of his control, and Robbo is an honorable type and wouldn't use it to angle his way our if he is on the verge of losing.
10-04-2018 , 12:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSkip
An injury clause covering events unrelated to training seems reasonable. No one is looking to take advantage of something out of his control, and Robbo is an honorable type and wouldn't use it to angle his way our if he is on the verge of losing.


.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-04-2018 , 12:24 AM
Rob you need to wager enough to win and afford the 2Pac BMW that just went up for $1.5M
10-04-2018 , 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSkip
An injury clause covering events unrelated to training seems reasonable. No one is looking to take advantage of something out of his control, and Robbo is an honorable type and wouldn't use it to angle his way our if he is on the verge of losing.
That's just it, playing softball at the risk of losing the bet due to injury seems perfectly fine at 3-1.

Part of the bet is doing what is necessary to complete the bet. In the same way he'd be sacrificing his time with the extra work jumping, he'd be sacrificing playing softball to avoid injury which would cost him the bet.
10-04-2018 , 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donat3llo
That's just it, playing softball at the risk of losing the bet due to injury seems perfectly fine at 3-1.

Part of the bet is doing what is necessary to complete the bet. In the same way he'd be sacrificing his time with the extra work jumping, he'd be sacrificing playing softball to avoid injury which would cost him the bet.
What if he gets hit by a car? What if a scorned lover burns off his toes with a curling iron?
Having a clause that negates the bet for unforeseen outside acts (and softball is included in that) is reasonable. Anyone betting against him would want him mucking around playing softball and whatever else as much as possible.
10-04-2018 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSkip
What if he gets hit by a car? What if a scorned lover burns off his toes with a curling iron?
Having a clause that negates the bet for unforeseen outside acts (and softball is included in that) is reasonable. Anyone betting against him would want him mucking around playing softball and whatever else as much as possible.
It's a fairly simple distinction. Getting hit by a car is likely beyond his control, playing softball is in his control.
10-04-2018 , 09:54 AM
To be clear, I'm not arguing against an injury clause in general. I support one; however, softball and other athletic type of activities shouldn't be included.
10-04-2018 , 12:53 PM
So like... don’t play softball or golf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-04-2018 , 01:19 PM
If you're getting hurt playing golf you're not doing it even remotely close to correctly
10-04-2018 , 01:24 PM
Turtle is spot on

If you participating in an activity or training and get hurt you lose - **** happens. Unless you’re Lebron James, it’s a risk. Welcome to becoming an old man. Every time I work out or play sports I’m 50/50 to come out if it a little messed up.

If you’re hurt by something out of your control- ie car accident it’s reasonable to end the bet without penalty

If there is something borderline ie you’re drunk and fall down- I think that’s probably on the side of control and you should be penalized/lose (unless you dunk of course)




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-04-2018 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
So like... don’t play softball or golf?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can definitely play but if injuring yourself doing so would mean you couldn't train or complete the bet I'd say that is on you.

But if shyt happens during everyday life then yeah, no worries don't sweat it. ie. If you go all Tarzan style like tootie and get hurt, I'd allow out of the bet for sure.
10-04-2018 , 01:41 PM
Is getting hit in the face by a softball a training injury?

Miami and Turtle are both wrong. Be gone with you!
10-04-2018 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobFarha
So like... don’t play softball or golf?
And if you went to Tootie's night course on Advanced Secs Moves 401, obviously no secs either.

GcluelesssecsnoobG
10-04-2018 , 01:52 PM
If rob wins is he now a professional dunker?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10-04-2018 , 02:02 PM
A professional gambler. Nothing would have changed.
10-04-2018 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSkip
Is getting hit in the face by a softball a training injury?

Miami and Turtle are both wrong. Be gone with you!
Whether it's a training injury is and should be irrelevant.

I mean, you can have your opinion but know that you're wrong.
10-04-2018 , 02:14 PM
When I do athletic prop bets and I have done many on both sides. If you hurt yourself - tough sht period. Its part of the gambool imo.

      
m