Quote:
Originally Posted by DaYu
so... what is the purpose of this thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by iraisetoomuch
To add as an additional factor in the decision.
And likely to out people who dont want to do it.
And out people who might want to, but have not made their intentions known.
Pretty much everything ir2m said. It is good to know who people respect/want to see mod so that when we make our decision it is not an unpopular one (although it is not a popularity contest). It also gives a chance for those who want to be a mod to speak up and say so. It works the other way too (i.e. GG). Basically venice is saying he wants to hear what people think, but just because X poster has been mentioned the most ITT it doesn't mean they are automatically the new mod, so leave all that other stuff (bashing and what not) at the door. Give us your opinion on who you think the best strat mod would be.
I am going to address this since it has been brought up and it is obvious a few people have some hard feelings.
Quote:
Just saying that guys that spend 90% of their 2+2 time "chatting" may not be the best choices for a site that's about advancing the game of poker and poker strategy.
If you look at the posts above, you'll see that most of the chat regulars have mainly nominated their chat buddies. Yet there are lots of other sharp individuals who should be considered.
Personally, I think 2+2 should consider guys like DGAF, daniel9861 and UCD LaCrosse who show respect for the game and other posters.
My point is the next LLSNL mod or mods should not be a popularity contest.
First of all I am one of those guys who spends a large majority of my time in the chat thread. That is no big secret. Still the forum has continued it's growth since its conception. I have busted my ass to give this place a community feel, a strong camaraderie between people with a similar interest if you will. This forum is the #1 strategy forum partly due to my efforts and my time spent in the chat thread. I really hate talking like that because I don't like to sound egotistical, but I have been told the same thing by others, so I guess it's not just me tooting my own horn.
The chat thread is considered the fraternity of LLSNL, although it is not a males only show, ask Snowball. It is not an exclusive club though, it is inclusive. Rarely do you get that in a forum of this size with a bond between people so big. It truly is unique. I have people PM'ing me about the Vegas trip and if they are allowed to be there because they are a low volume poster. My answer has always been, "EFF YEAH!" I know what it is like to be in a them vs us forum, and I have always tried to avoid that here. I think if you visited some other forums (not necessarily this site) you'd see that LLSNL bond is pretty effing rad and not as bad as you think it is.
LLSNL is modded in such a way that the mods don't have to take a hard line approach. We don't have to be nazi mods to get our point across. We only step in when necessary. Our job is to browse the strat threads and fix what needs to be fixed. It is not required that I post in X amount of threads. TBH, I have read and responded to so many HH's that it gets to the point that I am just repeating myself. I really only respond when I find a HH interesting, or I see a poster struggling with a spot that should be a very simple spot. I enjoy knowing that I helped improve someones game, not just responded to another random post and/or posted the same thing the 20 people said before me, although I still do that from time to time, but very rarely.
I am not sure you have a true feel for who the mods are or how they do things here. Venice is the least likely person in this whole forum to make this a popularity contest. If you knew the work he was putting into this you'd feel embarrassed for calling it a popularity contest. When he told me what he was doing I asked myself how the eff does he have time to do that. The guy is very detailed. What I will tell you is that we have criteria that the new mod needs to meet. One of those criteria is obviously he needs to be a strat thread guy. I suggested this as an effort to help build up the community bond of the people who post primarily in strat. I am a community guy after all. The next criteria, which is a biggie, is that the person picked should be a main fixture in this forum. Out of the three people you noted I only know one to be a pretty consistent face here (daniel9861). UCD came into the chat thread not too long ago and introduced himself to us. I have to assume he is fairly new here, but I could be wrong. DGAF is for sure not a fixture here. All three of the people you spoke about seem to be really good posters/players/etc. But I am not sure they all meet the criteria. The guys who have been mentioned the most (Garick, GG, Willyoman, and a few others) would be better mods because of the time spent here and their contributions to strat, even if they aren't high stakes crushers like DGAF, UCD, etc (which they could be, I have no proof saying they are not).
As you can see the mods here are not looking for the most popular poster in the forum. We are not looking for the best looking. When I came on that criteria was filled
. We are looking for the person that will be able to meet the goals and objectives for this forum, which is to make this the best forum evarrrrr.
With all that said I'd like to add...
tl;dr