Quote:
Originally Posted by bodybuilder32
Everything about your post is illogical, no offense. Mike Starr pointed out some of it.
Also, You should know that 400 hours is a pretty small sample size. Even with that said, your hourly at 2/5 is $7 an hour higher at 2/5. That seems big enough of a difference to want to keep playing at that stake, regardless of the swings. But thanks for leaving money on the table for the rest of us...
Not a single specific thing I stated in my post was illogical (and Mike wasn’t talking to me). I never said anything about playing easier for stacks in 2/5, someone else did. I acknowledged 2/5 has bigger stacks was all. 400 hours is also a fine sample size, consisting of 6000-8000 hands which leaves a relatively small, healthy margin for error statistically.
Anyway, back to the point: I agree with Notam, I felt like a stupid small raise was more likely to be a player raising a hand like 22-77 that wanted to build the pot a bit in a set mine situation. I practically never see someone raise tiny with a strong hand.
Last edited by HawkesDave; 09-21-2018 at 07:00 AM.