Quote:
Originally Posted by sinfonia
Thank you for your answers and sorry about the format I posted from my phone.i had no reads on villain at that time but after playing for a while with him and seeing some showdowns i don't think he folds much to 3bets and that might be the case for most players at this limit.I'm new to live games so i haven't adjusted, i just do what i do online.
What is your 3bet bluff range here.do you use suited small aces offsuit crap or you depolarize you range and just 3bet the top of your range?
I check folded and he snap shoved showing Jd.
You're adjusting to live poker completely wrong and so far your only justification for your line has been first-level thinking of a more sophisticated online variety, but it's still first level nonetheless. Who cares about your 3bet range? What do you think his opening range from CO is? How much of that range do you expect him to fold to a 3bet with position, especially if he knows you're an aggressive online player? How many Qs and overpairs vs bluffs and draws does he expect you to have on that board texture? I think most decent players would call two streets at least against you on that board texture with TPGK, especially if your image at the table at all matches up with what you presented to us here.
Here's a few population reads on LLSNL that are good for you to consider:
A) Most players' 3bet range at these stakes is QQ+.
B) Contra A, most players call 3bets way too wide considering A, especially when they open.
C) Players who 3bet wider or AK tend to follow through on multiple streets, often irrespective of board textures.
D) Players don't like to fold TP, especially HU and/or on wet board textures... At least until a flush comes in.
Thus, I think this hand is total spew. If you can actually give evidence-based justifications to the questions I posed at the beginning to support your line, it could be less spewey. Hope this helps.