Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Doomed
So let me try to wrap my head around this thought process. You are saying 5 bet Folding KK for around 30%+ of our stack is better than Flatting assuming he only 6 bets AA? Do you think he is calling with worse when we 5 bet him?
My point included the assumption that he has a flatting range/that his range has any linearity to it whatsoever/etc. Of *course* if his 6b range is [AA] and villain doesn't have a flatting range, then this entire conversation is moot. If 5b'ing gets nothing worse to continue, then there's no discussion worth having.
What I was demonstrating is that if (again, *IF*) villain has nothing in his 6b'ing range than AA, then that makes us more willing to 5b (with the intention of folding to a 6b), then if villain has a balanced shoving range (though it's never good regardless if villain isn't flatting worse hands). In other words, I wanted correct the line of thinking that, "If we 5b, then we have to fold, which obviously means that 5b'ing is bad." Because that's really not where the onus of this convo is.
But that might all seem like a quibble to you, in which case, fair enough, *shake hands* have a good day and all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Doomed
5 bet folding opens us up to being bluffed off the second nuts vs a guy that could be capable of doing so(we don't know for sure Obv)
This entire conversation started with you saying that if we 5b, we have to fold because we're always beat when players GII 200bbs+ deep. I said that--while I can't speak from certainty because I've never played these games--that I'd be surprised if it's the case that no one every GII this deep with anything less than AA, but if he does, then ... yadda yadda yadda, a bunch of discussion points that become completely irrelevant if you're now going to say that this player might bluff.
Last edited by surviva316; 11-23-2014 at 07:12 PM.