1/3, about 300 eff.
Villain in hand is a not very good but tight and not terrible young guy. We know each other a little, he knows I play tight and solid, or at least has some idea.
He raises UTG to 10. His preflop raising range is quite tight, so his UTG range should be even tighter. He mostly limp calls and is pretty passive; post-flop he's usually trying to GII with the nuts or otherwise folds, maybe calling with some medium strength hands or draws.
Folds to me in MP with KK
, I raise to 40. Folds around to V who calls.
Flop (80): TT6r
He checks, I bet 40, he quickly calls.
Turn (160): 3ss
He checks, I bet 90, he thinks for about 20 seconds and goes all in for 200.
So, I'm not super happy here, but I still think I have to call, it's an easy call getting 4:1. Anyone disagree?
My real question is whether I should consider checking back this turn and then either calling or better river when checked to. When I bet I'm basically hoping to GII vs JJ or QQ... I don't know if he x/shoves these hands on the turn or just x/calls or even folds (I really doubt it!), maybe he realizes it's basically the same thing (calling vs. shoving) since he's commited, but mayyyybe not.
If he happens to have AA or Tx, then checking turn and just calling river will save me money — he should be 4! AA though at least 50% of the time I would guess. And shouldn't be too many T's either in his UTG raising or calling the 3! range. 66 is possible as well.
So idk, thoughts on the turn decision(s)? I think it's kind of meh either way, but am still leaning towards betting and getting it in.